2018
DOI: 10.1190/geo2016-0566.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A sequential dynamic Bayesian network for pore-pressure estimation with uncertainty quantification

Abstract: Use policyThe full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that:• a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.Please consult the full D… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To reconciliate the direct pore pressure measurements in sandstones with the effective stress approach formulated for shales, it is essential to understand pore pressure behavior in shale and other tight formations with ultra-low permeability. This requires another approach, commonly used during 1D mechanical earth model (MEM) characterization (Oughton et al, 2018;Sayers et al, 2006;Plumb et al, 2000). For example, if an elevated pore pressure is the result of undercompaction, due to fluid trapping during burial, this is refereed by some authors as disequilibrium compaction phenomenon.…”
Section: Conventional Deterministic Approaches For Pore Pressure Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reconciliate the direct pore pressure measurements in sandstones with the effective stress approach formulated for shales, it is essential to understand pore pressure behavior in shale and other tight formations with ultra-low permeability. This requires another approach, commonly used during 1D mechanical earth model (MEM) characterization (Oughton et al, 2018;Sayers et al, 2006;Plumb et al, 2000). For example, if an elevated pore pressure is the result of undercompaction, due to fluid trapping during burial, this is refereed by some authors as disequilibrium compaction phenomenon.…”
Section: Conventional Deterministic Approaches For Pore Pressure Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bektas et al (2015) apply a sequential modeling approach to pore pressure prediction. Oughton et al (2017) use a Bayesian network model to connect the pore pressure variables at different depths, and to different kinds of data. These approaches are similar to what we are doing here, but without the same focus on the spatial modeling aspect and on learning the prior and likelihood models from data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%