1994
DOI: 10.1177/01454455940183003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Sequential, Test-Control Methodology for Conducting Functional Analyses of Self-Injurious Behavior

Abstract: Multielement and reversal designs used to identify maintaining variables for behavior disorders such as self-injury have several potential limitations, including interaction effects (multielement), inefficiency (reversal), and lack of a continuous control (reversal). This article describes a methodology that minimizes these problems yet captures the best features of both designs. This design consists of several phases implemented in a sequential (A-B-C) fashion, as in the reversal design. However, each phase c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
135
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(138 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
135
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For Katy, all sessions were 20 min in length. Finally, the analysis was conducted using a pairwise comparison design (Iwata, Duncan, Zarcone, Lerman, & Shore, 1994) to help Katy discriminate among the different conditions.…”
Section: Procedures and Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Katy, all sessions were 20 min in length. Finally, the analysis was conducted using a pairwise comparison design (Iwata, Duncan, Zarcone, Lerman, & Shore, 1994) to help Katy discriminate among the different conditions.…”
Section: Procedures and Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assessments for Rick and Sue were conducted within a multielement design (Iwata, Dorsey, Slifer, Bauman, & Richman, 1982); John's assessment was conducted within a modified design that combined features of the multielement and reversal designs (Iwata, Duncan, Lerman, & Shore, 1994).…”
Section: Experimental Sequencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This methodology has since been refined and alternative techniques developed (Carr & Durand, 1985;Iwata, Dorsey, Slifer, Bauman, & Richman, 1994;Iwata, Duncan, Zarcone, Lerman, & Shore, 1994;Vollmer, Iwata, Duncan, & Lerman, 1993;Vollmer, Iwata, Zarcone, Smith, & Mazaleski, 1993;Neef & Iwata, 1994). Experimental functional analysis is now widely accepted as one of the best procedures for ascertaining if operant social reinforcement influences a given behavior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%