2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2006.02115.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A series of melanomas smaller than 4 mm and implications for the ABCDE rule

Abstract: The findings of this study support those authors who have suggested elimination of the 6-mm diameter criterion in the ABCDE rule. In addition, this study provides further evidence that dark colour as a diagnostic criterion for melanoma should be given more emphasis. The substitution of 'D' to represent dark instead of diameter is worthy of consideration to enhance the value of the ABCDE mnemonic.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
40
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The parameters asymmetry, border irregularity, color (multiple colors), and diameter larger than 6 mm are used globally in medical education and in the lay press to provide simple parameters for evaluation of pigmented skin lesions which may require a more comprehensive examination by a specialist. While the A, B, and C criteria have been widely accepted, the emergence of reports with a significant proportion of melanomas with a diameter < 6 mm [15,16], has generated controversy around the criterion D, questioning its usefulness in recognizing incipient lesions. In our study, the vast majority of the melanomas that led to patient’s consultation (MMC) fulfilled the 4 ABCD criteria with a 97% of lesions with a diameter > 6 mm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parameters asymmetry, border irregularity, color (multiple colors), and diameter larger than 6 mm are used globally in medical education and in the lay press to provide simple parameters for evaluation of pigmented skin lesions which may require a more comprehensive examination by a specialist. While the A, B, and C criteria have been widely accepted, the emergence of reports with a significant proportion of melanomas with a diameter < 6 mm [15,16], has generated controversy around the criterion D, questioning its usefulness in recognizing incipient lesions. In our study, the vast majority of the melanomas that led to patient’s consultation (MMC) fulfilled the 4 ABCD criteria with a 97% of lesions with a diameter > 6 mm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a case series by Kamino et al, 38 20% (4/20) of small melanomas (\6 mm) were darkly pigmented, however, Bergman et al 39 found this percentage to be significantly lower (3.5%; 4/112). The intensity of dark pigment has been noted as a clinical characteristic in small melanomas less than 4 mm, 40 and Helsing and Loeb 27 indicated that darker color change was a more frequent observation among small melanomas (\7 mm), compared with nonsmall melanomas. Patient perceptions of presenting features for 92 SSM and 33 nodular melanomas indicated that the predominant color of SSM was dark brown (37.8%) followed by black (26.7%) and light brown (17.8%), and the predominant color of nodular melanoma was pink (33.3%) followed by black (24.3%) and red (21.2%).…”
Section: Use Of the Diameter (D) Criterionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The clinical ABCDE rule fails to recognise MMs that are small (less than 6 mm in diameter) or that exhibit regular shape and homogeneous colour, are symmetrical or undergo unnoticed changes (10,11). Dermoscopy is now well accepted as a non-invasive technique that improves the accuracy of skin tumour diagnosis (12)(13)(14), and is especially useful in the differential diagnosis of MM simulators or hypopigmented MM, avoiding unnecessary excisions (15)(16)(17).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%