2022
DOI: 10.1051/aacus/2022017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A series of SNR-based speech intelligibility models in the Auditory Modeling Toolbox

Abstract: This technical paper presents a series of speech intelligibility models that have been developed since the original version proposed by Lavandier and Culling [(2010). Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 127, 387–399]. This binaural model accounts for better-ear listening and binaural unmasking to predict the intelligibility of a near-field target speech among multiple stationary noise sources in rooms for normal-hearing listeners. Subsequent model versions allowed to consider a reverberated speech tar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For objective acoustic indicators, this study has selected LAeq (A-weighted equivalent continuous sound level) as the primary monitoring metric owing to the discontinuity of park soundscapes [39]. For thermal environment metrics, the Universal Thermal Climate Index (UTCI) was chosen given the instability of outdoor thermal conditions [40].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For objective acoustic indicators, this study has selected LAeq (A-weighted equivalent continuous sound level) as the primary monitoring metric owing to the discontinuity of park soundscapes [39]. For thermal environment metrics, the Universal Thermal Climate Index (UTCI) was chosen given the instability of outdoor thermal conditions [40].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the AMT 1.1, we have loudness models represented by moore1997 [52], glasberg2002 [53], and chen2011 [54] as well as a loudness model considering binaural inhibition, moore2016 [55]. We have monaural speech perception models such as joergensen 2011 [56], taal2011 [57], and joergensen2013 [7], and models considering binaural speech processing such as culling2004 [58], jelfs2011 [59], leclere2015 [60], hauth2020 [61], prudhomme2020 [62], vicente 2020nh [63], vicente2020 [64], and lavandier2022 [65]. For perceptual similarity, we have osses2021 [66] as a monaural model and llado2022 [67] as a binaural model considering the effect of head-worn devices.…”
Section: Perception and Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many studies related to soundscapes, general evaluations of soundscapes are usually considered to be evaluations of sound levels, that is, the subjective evaluation of loudness, usually of background noise [1][2][3][4][5][6]. Soundscape evaluations are also considered to be evaluations of sound preferences, that is, evaluations of foreground sounds [7][8][9][10][11]. Individual sounds play an important role in the overall soundscape [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%