2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.148708
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A SERS substrate with remarkable reproducibility: Adsorbing and detecting both hydrophobic and hydrophilic molecules using rGO/PEI/PAA/CD-AgNP nanocomposites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By analogy, the peak at 560 cm –1 in Figure a corresponds to the Raman peak of the C–H bending in the pristine polyelectrolytes . After electroforming (Figure b), interestingly, new Raman peaks are observed at 1346 and 1590 cm –1 , which depict the C–H bending vibration and C–C stretching vibration, respectively. , It is known that only the interdiffusion of the counterion cannot induce the changes mentioned above. In general, there are two reasons for enhancement of Raman signals. The first reason is the surface-enhanced raman scattering (SERS) due to metal particles.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By analogy, the peak at 560 cm –1 in Figure a corresponds to the Raman peak of the C–H bending in the pristine polyelectrolytes . After electroforming (Figure b), interestingly, new Raman peaks are observed at 1346 and 1590 cm –1 , which depict the C–H bending vibration and C–C stretching vibration, respectively. , It is known that only the interdiffusion of the counterion cannot induce the changes mentioned above. In general, there are two reasons for enhancement of Raman signals. The first reason is the surface-enhanced raman scattering (SERS) due to metal particles.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…After electroforming (Figure b), interestingly, new Raman peaks are observed at 1346 and 1590 cm –1 , which depict the C–H bending vibration and C–C stretching vibration, respectively. , It is known that only the interdiffusion of the counterion cannot induce the changes mentioned above. In general, there are two reasons for enhancement of Raman signals. The first reason is the surface-enhanced raman scattering (SERS) due to metal particles. There are no metal particles in the polyelectrolyte films, implying that the increased crystallinity is responsible for the Raman signal enhancement in this case .…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…35 Therefore, to improve the pH tolerance of immobilized enzyme, the TA/ AEAPTES coating structure was optimized by adding the third hydrophilic monomer, 36 which was TEOS and PEI. 37 The water contact angles of the TA/AEAPTES, TA/AEAPTES/ TEOS, and TA/AEAPTES/PEI modified membranes are 50.8°, 40.8°, and 38.5°, respectively. Therefore, the hydrophilicity of the coatings was enhanced by introducing TOES and PEI.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Higher hydrophilicity is favorable to maintain enzyme conformation . Therefore, to improve the pH tolerance of immobilized enzyme, the TA/AEAPTES coating structure was optimized by adding the third hydrophilic monomer, which was TEOS and PEI . The water contact angles of the TA/AEAPTES, TA/AEAPTES/TEOS, and TA/AEAPTES/PEI modified membranes are 50.8°, 40.8°, and 38.5°, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26 After electroforming (Figure 3a−c), new Raman peaks are observed at 1346 and 1590 cm −1 , depicting the C−H bending and C−C stretching, respectively. 27,28 Also, in Figure 3b,c, new Raman peaks are observed at 912 cm −1 , which correspond to a sulfonic group of PSS, 29,30 after electroforming. These phenomena suggest that the external electric field drives polyelectrolyte chain migration, resulting in an increase in crystallinity responsible for the Raman signal enhancement.…”
Section: ■ Experimental Detailsmentioning
confidence: 88%