A service evaluation describing a nurse‐led prostate cancer service in NHS, Ayrshire and Arran

Abstract

From 1999, the NHS Ayrshire and Arran Health Board implemented an innovative nurse-led collaborative care model for the management of patients with prostate cancer (PC). This article describes the model and presents the results of a local evaluation to assess its impact. The evaluation comprised a retrospective audit of the service against national standards for PC management, undertaken in 2012. Seventy-one patients, who were under the care of the service during June 2008, were included. Patient and staff satisfaction were also assessed using questionnaires distributed to 75 patients undergoing outpatient or telephone reviews during April 2012 and 7 one-to-one semi-structured staff interviews. The patient audit showed good compliance with standards relating to selection of appropriate PC treatments according to tumour stage and grade; radiotherapy dosing and referral-to-treatment times. Areas requiring improvement were the documentation of patients' risk and performance status and provision of verbal and written information to patients and carers. Seventy-three per cent of the patient questionnaires were returned, with 96% of respondents rating their overall care as 'excellent' or 'very good'. Staff satisfaction was also high and interviewees described many benefits of the service for patients, hospital staff, GPs and the NHS/health board. Negative responses related mainly to demand/capacity issues. Overall, the evaluation showed good compliance with many national standards and high levels of patient and staff satisfaction. This suggests that with trained and competent nursing staff and collaborative multidisciplinary team working, safe and appropriate care can be achieved for more complex, as well as very stable PC patients.

Nurse-led renal cancer follow-up is safe and associated with high patient satisfaction—an audit from the East of England

“…Faithful [11] noted that nurse-led care is efficient and ultimately decreases waiting times. Nurse-led care also frees up time in consultant clinics and allows them to spend time with complicated patients [7, 8].…”

Quality of leadership in multidisciplinary cancer tumor boards: development and evaluation of a leadership assessment instrument (ATLAS)

“…If, however, non-technical skills are considered to be more essential in chaining and leading such complex meetings than clinical expertise, it may not be necessary or indeed beneficial for surgeons to be leading MTBs. Innovative senior cancer nurses are leading teams and chairing MTBs in some UK cancer centers (33) and perhaps non-clinical staff or former users of the services could also be contemplated for this role if they have the requisite chairing and leadership skills. Such innovative practices may help address some of the shortcomings of MTB-based decision-making, which include the lack of focus on the psychosocial and holistic patient review and the often exclusive focus on the biomedical aspects of the disease.…”

Nurse-led active surveillance for prostate cancer is safe, effective and associated with high rates of patient satisfaction—results of an audit in the East of England

“…Frew and Leung [ 28 ] state their move to a nurse-led model provided in secondary care freed consultant time, although it should be noted that this was a service originally provided in the community with practice nurses administering hormone injections to patients in the general practitioner's practice or their home. McGlynn et al [ 29 ] also state their nurse-led model reduced outpatient pressure for appointments and freed up consultant capacity.…”