2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.02.076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A SFEM-based evaluation of mode-I Stress Intensity Factor in composite structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
24
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 118 publications
1
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the present novel results are compared to the same solutions obtained through commercial finite element codes (Abaqus and Straus7). For the sake of conciseness and also because the SFEM implementation is not the main purpose of the present work, interested readers are invited to read reference papers for details on this numerical technique [176][177][178][179][180][181][182][183]. In a few words, SFEM is a domain decomposition technique in which the continuity among the elements is enforced in terms of displacements and stresses and the solution is sought in the strong form.…”
Section: Numerical Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, the present novel results are compared to the same solutions obtained through commercial finite element codes (Abaqus and Straus7). For the sake of conciseness and also because the SFEM implementation is not the main purpose of the present work, interested readers are invited to read reference papers for details on this numerical technique [176][177][178][179][180][181][182][183]. In a few words, SFEM is a domain decomposition technique in which the continuity among the elements is enforced in terms of displacements and stresses and the solution is sought in the strong form.…”
Section: Numerical Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the authors consider a strong form finite element scheme termed SFEM (Strong Formulation Finite Element Method [176][177][178][179][180][181][182][183]) for the following simulations. Moreover, the present novel results are compared to the same solutions obtained through commercial finite element codes (Abaqus and Straus7).…”
Section: Numerical Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Once the governing equations are obtained, they are numerically solved by means of the Generalized Differential Quadrature (GDQ) method [90], whose main features are illustrated in detail by Tornabene et al in the review paper [91]. The accuracy, reliability and stability characteristic of this numerical tool can be checked considering the excellent results shown in the works [39][40][41][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][79][80][81][82][83][92][93][94][95][96][97][98][99][100][101][102], which have been obtained in different kinds of structural problems related to plates and shells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ansari et al [44] applied the variational differential quadrature (VDQ) method to study the free vibration characteristic of embedded functionally graded carbon nanotubereinforced composite (FG-CNTRC) spherical shells having classical boundary condition resting on the elastic foundation. Tornabene et al [45] applied the generalized differential quadrature method [45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60] and Carrera unified formulation to study the effect of Carbon Nanotube (CNT) agglomeration on the free vibration of laminated composite doubly-curved shells and panels reinforced by CNTs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%