1995
DOI: 10.1007/bf00952258
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Shadowing Theorem for ordinary differential equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the hypotheses of the theorem are presented with an eye toward computer verification. The theorem is similar to the finite time shadowing theorems of Coomes, Koçak, and Palmer [7], [10], but takes into account information provided by g and allows one to say more about the shadowing orbit, namely that it lies in Λ.…”
Section: Dg(y)f (Y) =mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, the hypotheses of the theorem are presented with an eye toward computer verification. The theorem is similar to the finite time shadowing theorems of Coomes, Koçak, and Palmer [7], [10], but takes into account information provided by g and allows one to say more about the shadowing orbit, namely that it lies in Λ.…”
Section: Dg(y)f (Y) =mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…. , N − 1, x − y k ≤ ε 0 and 0 ≤ t ≤ h k + ε 0 it follows from (3.9), (3.10), (3.11), Gronwall's Lemma, and the variation of constants formula (see [7] for details) that…”
Section: Lemma 53 the Local Boundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, at each step we could use ϕ h i as defined in equation (1.4) with h = h i being the length of the ODE integration timestep taken at step i. The resulting method for shadowing numerical ODE integrations has been dubbed the Map Method by Coomes, Koçak, and Palmer (1994b, 1995a, 1995b. As described in section 2.2.5, however, ODE integrations suffer from errors in time.…”
Section: Rescaling Time 361 Informal Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For large |t − t 0 | this can be a significant difference, so a shadowing method which does not take the rescaling of time into account is likely to grossly underestimate the length of the shadow. Coomes, Koçak, and Palmer (1994b, 1995a, 1995b dramatically demonstrate this when they show that a rescaling of time allows the Lorenz equations to be shadowed for almost 10 5 time units, while the map method, which does not rescale time, finds shadows lasting only 10 time units-an astounding increase in shadow length of a factor of 10 4 ! Finally, note that the non-shadowable example given in the tutorial (y = 0, page 11) is shadowable if time is rescaled.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation