2003
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2003.817267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A shape-based approach to change detection of lakes using time series remote sensing images

Abstract: Abstract-Shape analysis has not been considered in remote sensing as extensively as in other pattern recognition applications. However, shapes such as those of geometric patterns in agriculture and irregular boundaries of lakes can be extracted from the remotely sensed imagery even at relatively coarse spatial resolutions. This paper presents a procedure for efficiently retrieving and representing shapes of interesting features in remotely sensed imagery using supervised classification, object recognition, par… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(37 reference statements)
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The Direct Object change detection (DOCD) approach is based on the comparison of object geometrical properties (Lefebvre et al, 2008;Zhou et al, 2008), spectral information (Miller et al, 2005;Hall and Hay, 2003) or texture features (Lefebvre et al, 2008;Tomowski et al, 2011). In Classified Objects change detection (COCD) approach the extracted objects are compared based on the geometry and class labels (Chant, Kelly, 2009;Jiang and Narayanan, 2003). The framework based on post-classification (Blaschke, 2005) presumes extracting objects and independently classifying them (Im and Jensen, 2005;Hansen and Loveland, 2012).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Direct Object change detection (DOCD) approach is based on the comparison of object geometrical properties (Lefebvre et al, 2008;Zhou et al, 2008), spectral information (Miller et al, 2005;Hall and Hay, 2003) or texture features (Lefebvre et al, 2008;Tomowski et al, 2011). In Classified Objects change detection (COCD) approach the extracted objects are compared based on the geometry and class labels (Chant, Kelly, 2009;Jiang and Narayanan, 2003). The framework based on post-classification (Blaschke, 2005) presumes extracting objects and independently classifying them (Im and Jensen, 2005;Hansen and Loveland, 2012).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data published per day for this spatial program corresponds to more than 15 TB of images from multiple sensors (Sentinel-1, Sentinel-2, Sentinel-3, and Sentinel-5). Several methods were developed to use satellite image time series (SITS) for land cover mapping [1], change detection [8], tree species detection [9], or crop classification [10]. Thanks to the high revisiting period, Sentinel imagery (whether SAR for Sentinel-1 or optical for Sentinel-2), many works showed the importance of these images for Land Use/Land Cover (LULC) mapping both for optical [11], and SAR imagery [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blob/tubular detection refers to methods that are aimed at detecting clustered points in the image that are either brighter or darker than the surrounding region. The shape-based object detection in images is an important step in the analysis of large-scale scientific data, as for example: satellite and Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) images for human, fire and building detection, lakes detection from radiometric and geometric rectified Landsat Multispectral Scanner (MSS) images and Thematic Mapper (TM) images, light points detection, blob detection in infrared images, medical imaging and others [9,17,29,37]. In the medical imaging context, the detection of bleeding/blood regions in WCE images, bright lesions in fundus images, nodule detection in thorax X-ray images, nuclei detection in microscopic zebrafish images, enhancement of vascular structures, detection of lesions in images of multiple sclerosis patients, tumor detection based on blob detection, [10,12,14,16,22,27,32,39] represent some of the examples addressed by the community.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%