1997
DOI: 10.2307/3546097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Shared Niche? The Case of the Species Pair Protea obtusifolia-Leucadendron meridianum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In eukaryotic models of colonization via a competitive lottery, functional groupings (or "guilds") often reflect taxonomic groupings (15,(73)(74)(75)(76). Alternatively, there may be taxonomic redundancy, in which any given function is distributed broadly across a variety of taxa as opposed to being associated with any particular taxonomic group.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In eukaryotic models of colonization via a competitive lottery, functional groupings (or "guilds") often reflect taxonomic groupings (15,(73)(74)(75)(76). Alternatively, there may be taxonomic redundancy, in which any given function is distributed broadly across a variety of taxa as opposed to being associated with any particular taxonomic group.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although our samples are taken over a limited time scale, and thus do not fully accommodate potential successional or historic changes in these communities, the evidence presented here and in our previous study (13) is most consistent with a competitive lottery model for community assembly on the surface of U. australis. Originally proposed for coral reef fish (15,73), and subsequently applied to plant (74,75) and parasite communities (76), the lottery model combines functional (niche-or guild-based) and random components as drivers of community structure. Specifically, species with similar trophic or other ecological properties are able to occupy the same niche within an ecosystem, and the particular species that occupies a particular space is then determined by stochastic recruitment.…”
Section: Structure Of Bacterial Communities: Assembly Of Functional Gmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Å gren and Fagerstrøm (1984) suggested that species with similar resource niches may coexist if they are sufficiently similar in their skills to compete for the limiting resource. Keddy (1989) likewise argued that species with similar niches can coexist because their competitive abilities are symmetrical, and neither can thus exclude the other. Wiens (1993) related niche overlap to competition strength.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The competitive exclusion principle became a paradigm for ecological thinking during the last century and a great number of resource partitioning studies have provided support for the theory by documenting the shared niche dimension that allow species to coexist (Schoener 1974;Moyle 1977;Ross 1986;Greenberg 1991). However, despite its status as a paradigm the competitive exclusion principle has been challenged (Hardin 1960;Walter 1988;Leibold 1998) and several modifications have been proposed (Å gren and Fagerstrøm 1984;Keddy 1989;Wiens 1993;Bengtsson et al 1994;Jensen 1996;Schoener 1989). Å gren and Fagerstrøm (1984) suggested that species with similar resource niches may coexist if they are sufficiently similar in their skills to compete for the limiting resource.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…see [5,6]). Lottery models also provide a basis for understanding the coexistence of multiple species in terrestrial systems [7]. Additionally, Dewi and Chesson [8] studied a lottery model with a stage structure and Comins and Noble [9] studied the model with heterogeneous patches.…”
Section: P I (T + 1) = (1 − δ I (T))p I (T) + S(p 1 (T) P N mentioning
confidence: 99%