A sharing-oriented design strategy for networked knowledge organization systems

Shaw, Ryan; Rabinowitz, Adam; Golden, Patrick; Kansa, Eric

doi:10.1007/s00799-015-0164-0

Cited by 14 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…To achieve interoperability across different European languages and cultures is challenging, and adherence to data standards is essential for any level of semantic interoperability and cross-search. In ARIADNE, national subject terms have been mapped to a common core standard (in this case, the Getty Art and Architecture Thesaurus) and archaeological period terms have been defined according to explicit criteria, working with the North American PeriodO initiative (Shaw et al 2015). As always, there are challenges in turning projects into services, but by linking ARIADNE to the ESFRI roadmap (ESFRI 2016) via the preparatory phase for a new infrastructure dedicated to Heritage Science (), it is anticipated that ARIADNE can achieve sustainability.…”

Section: Joining It All Upmentioning

confidence: 99%

Twenty Years Preserving Data

Richards

2017

Adv. archaeol. pract.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In 2016 the Archaeology Data Service (ADS) was 20 years old. Since its birth the ADS has had to respond to rapid changes in technology, as well as major cultural and organizational changes in the external operating environment, from which a sustainable business model for digital preservation has emerged. This article will take a retrospective look at challenges that have been faced and will review current and future priorities for those seeking to establish digital repositories. Digital preservation and open access to research data are now much higher up the agenda of funding bodies, but there is still lack of agreement on what constitutes a core digital archive from a fieldwork project. The paper will review what the significant properties of an archaeological archive are, and how reuse can be supported, linking data and publications. It will consider the challenge of dealing with the gray literature and of avoiding creating further data silos, featuring new initiatives to provide interoperability between digital repositories. It will review the role of data and metadata standards, and consider how the profession needs to address its responsibilities over the next 20 years.

show abstract

Section: Joining It All Upmentioning

confidence: 99%

Twenty Years Preserving Data

Richards

2017

Adv. archaeol. pract.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The gazetteer is editable via HTTP; contributors can submit proposed changes in the form of patches, and the PeriodO editors can accept or reject them. All proposed and accepted changes are stored, and each period definition has a history of changes in the form of patch submissions and approvals (Shaw et al, 2015). To ease the process of creating patches that conform to the PeriodO data model, we developed an editing interface that runs in a standard web browser (see Fig.…”

Section: The Periodo Period Gazetteermentioning

confidence: 99%

Nanopublication beyond the sciences: the PeriodO period gazetteer

Golden

Shaw

2016

PeerJ Computer Science

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The information expressed in humanities datasets is inextricably tied to a wider discursive environment that is irreducible to complete formal representation. Humanities scholars must wrestle with this fact when they attempt to publish or consume structured data. The practice of "nanopublication," which originated in the e-science domain, offers a way to maintain the connection between formal representations of humanities data and its discursive basis. In this paper we describe nanopublication, its potential applicability to the humanities, and our experience curating humanities nanopublications in the PeriodO period gazetteer.

show abstract

Section: The Periodo Period Gazetteermentioning

confidence: 99%

Peer Review #2 of "Nanopublication beyond the sciences: the PeriodO period gazetteer (v0.2)"

McMillan¹

2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The information expressed in humanities datasets is inextricably tied to a wider discursive environment that is irreducible to complete formal representation. Humanities scholars must wrestle with this fact when they attempt to publish or consume structured data. The practice of "nanopublication", which originated in the e-science domain, offers a way to maintain the connection between formal representations of humanities data and its discursive basis. In this paper we describe nanopublication, its potential applicability to the humanities, and our experience curating humanities nanopublications in the PeriodO period gazetteer.

show abstract

A sharing-oriented design strategy for networked knowledge organization systems

Cited by 14 publications

References 19 publications

Twenty Years Preserving Data

Twenty Years Preserving Data

Nanopublication beyond the sciences: the PeriodO period gazetteer

Peer Review #2 of "Nanopublication beyond the sciences: the PeriodO period gazetteer (v0.2)"

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About