2001
DOI: 10.1006/jcph.2001.6916
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Sharp Interface Cartesian Grid Method for Simulating Flows with Complex Moving Boundaries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
298
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 457 publications
(307 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
2
298
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For sharp interface methods, one issue encountered with moving boundaries is the so called "fresh-cell" problem [44,45]. This refers to the situation where a cell that is in the solid at one time step, emerges into the fluid at the next time-step due to boundary motion.…”
Section: Boundarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For sharp interface methods, one issue encountered with moving boundaries is the so called "fresh-cell" problem [44,45]. This refers to the situation where a cell that is in the solid at one time step, emerges into the fluid at the next time-step due to boundary motion.…”
Section: Boundarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The implicitly filtered LES momentum and continuity equations for incompressible flow were solved over a general non-orthogonal, boundary-fitted, multi-block finitevolume mesh, supplemented by the immersed boundary method (Udaykumar et al 2001) to cater specifically to the complexities posed by the round orifices and the cavities. In total, the default mesh covering the duct-flow domain contained around 11 million nodes, while each cavity was meshed with a further 0.8 million nodes.…”
Section: The Computational Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former methods are known as immersed boundary formulations and tend to smear a solid boundary across few grid nodes due to the discrete delta function formulation they employ to introduce the effect of the boundary on the equations of motion [2]. The latter class of methods, on the other hand, treats solid boundaries as sharp interfaces utilizing either Cartesian, cut-cell formulations [3,4] or hybrid Cartesian/Immersed Boundary (HCIB) approaches (see [5,6,1,7] among others)-the reader is referred to [8,9] for more detailed discussion of this class of methods. Regardless on whether a diffused or a sharp interface formulation is employed, however, all available non-boundary conforming methods solve the Navier-Stokes equations in a background coordinate-conforming mesh, such as a Cartesian (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%