2012
DOI: 10.1512/iumj.2012.61.4946
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A sharpened Schwarz-Pick operatorial inequality for nilpotent operators

Abstract: Let denote by S(φ) the extremal operator defined by the compression of the unilateral shift S to the model subspace H(φ) = H 2 ⊖ φ H 2 as the following S(φ)f (z) = P (zf (z)), where P denotes the orthogonal projection from H 2 onto H(φ) and φ is an inner function on the unit disc. In this mathematical notes, we give an explicit formula of the numerical radius of S(φ) in the particular case where φ is a finite Blaschke product with unique zero and an estimate on the general case. We establish also a sharpened S… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A lot is known about the numerical ranges W (S Θ ) associated to unicritical Θ. For example in [22], Gaaya characterized their numerical radii and established a number of intermediate results, including the following useful equality in his Proposition 2.6:…”
Section: The Case Of a Unicritical θmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A lot is known about the numerical ranges W (S Θ ) associated to unicritical Θ. For example in [22], Gaaya characterized their numerical radii and established a number of intermediate results, including the following useful equality in his Proposition 2.6:…”
Section: The Case Of a Unicritical θmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For now, recall that Crouzeix's conjecture states: given a square matrix A, the best constant C for which (22) p(A) ≤ C max Before proceeding to the proof, a few comments are in order. First in [14], Crouzeix proved that the numerical range of a 3×3 nilpotent matrix is a 2-spectral set; that is, in this case the constant C in (22) can be taken to be 2. Because A t from ( 12) is nilpotent, that establishes Proposition 5.6 but with constant 2.…”
Section: A Curve In W (A T )mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The study of the numerical range of J n (a) was started by Gaaya in [1,2] and continued by the present authors in [5]. As a meeting ground of the classes of nilpotent, Toeplitz, nonnegative, S n -and S −1 n -matrices, J n (a) has diverse and interesting properties concerning its numerical range.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%