1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1520-6750(199902)46:1<1::aid-nav1>3.3.co;2-r
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A shifting bottleneck heuristic for minimizing the total weighted tardiness in a job shop

Abstract: Abstract:We present a shifting bottleneck heuristic for minimizing the total weighted tardiness in a job shop. The method decomposes the job shop into a number of single-machine subproblems that are solved one after another. Each machine is scheduled according to the solution of its corresponding subproblem. The order in which the single machine subproblems are solved has a significant impact on the quality of the overall solution and on the time required to obtain this solution. We therefore test a number of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The due date range factor RDD is set to 0.2 to increase the contention around the average due date. In order to assign the weights for the TWT instances, we follow a strategy similar to that in Pinedo and Singer (1999). The weights are set randomly to one of three possible values 3, 2, and 1, which represent high, medium, and low job priority levels, respectively.…”
Section: Random Relative Perturbationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The due date range factor RDD is set to 0.2 to increase the contention around the average due date. In order to assign the weights for the TWT instances, we follow a strategy similar to that in Pinedo and Singer (1999). The weights are set randomly to one of three possible values 3, 2, and 1, which represent high, medium, and low job priority levels, respectively.…”
Section: Random Relative Perturbationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most of the successful neighborhood structures, a feasible solution is represented by a disjunctive graph and neighborhood is defined by the changes of operation sequences processed on the same machine. In this section, disjunctive graph representation for a tardiness minimization by Pinedo and Singer (1999) is presented. Neighborhoods are defined with the disjunctive graph model and the local search procedure of Essafi et al (2008) which is used in our proposed method is explained.…”
Section: Local Search Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are roughly two kinds of approaches for the minimization of total weighted tardiness. First one is using iterated local search procedures proposed by Kreipl (2000) and Essafi et al (2008), which are quite efficient in terms of performance on standard benchmark problems (Pinedo and Singer, 1999). The large step random walk proposed by Kreipl (2000) consists of iterative improvement to intensify search and random walk to escape from the local optima.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the one hand, the approximate and heuristic methods make a tradeoff between solution quality and computational cost. These methods include dispatching priority rules 8 , shifting bottleneck approach 9 , and Lagrangian relaxation 10 . More recently, with the emergence of new techniques from the field of artificial intelligence, much attention has been devoted to meta-heuristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%