A shifting enemy: analysing the BBC’s representations of “al-Qaeda” in the aftermath of the September 11^th2001 attacks

Abstract

This article seeks to explore how the BBC made sense of the al-Qaeda phenomenon in its flagship "News at Ten" bulletin during the aftermath of the September 11 th 2001 attacks. Using Critical Multimodal Discourse Analysis, it shows how the BBC's representations function as a dynamic and continually shifting site upon which a range of fears, identities, discourses and forms of knowledge and power struggle and contend, and through which a number of different "al-Qaedas" manifest themselves. In particular, three shifting modes of visual and verbal representation are identified within the BBC's coverage which each correspond to a separate understanding of al-Qaeda: the "Islamic" mode, the "Personalised" mode and the "Elusive" mode. These representations both draw upon and challenge the dominant discourses surrounding Islam, non-state terrorism, and the identities of terrorist suspects, providing audiences with a variety of, often conflicting, ways of seeing and speaking about this entity. As such, the article provides insight into the complex nature of the BBC's representations of al-Qaeda during its coverage of the September 11th 2001 attacks, and shows how such complexity serves, albeit inadvertently, to legitimise the far-reaching counterterrorism policies that were enacted in the aftermath of these attacks.

Terrorism Studies beyond counter-counterterrorism: opening the door to Jenseits

“…In a similar vein, writers like Chukwuma (2021;, Lunstrum (2009) and Sharp (2011) have documented how Indigenous governments emerging after the terror of colonisation have attempted to solidify their Lord-subjectivity through appeals to their ability to protect Bondsmen-citizens against the 'terrorism' of their factional enemies. Others have interrogated the strategies through which terrorism and terrorists are constituted as figures of living death in postcolonial literature (Malreddy 2015;Monaco 2021), in legislation, public statements and policy documents published by postcolonial and (neo-)imperial states (Dixit 2016;Feyyaz 2016;McQuade 2020;Meier 2022;Merskin 2004); in Counterterrorism practices in postcolonial states (Abu-Bakare 2020; Anwa & Işleyen 2023; Finden & Dutta 2024; Parashar 2018); and in news and popular media discourses both in the colony and the homeland of the coloniser (Ahmad 2016;Featherstone et al 2010;Khan 2021;Martini 2018;Nacos 2005).…”

Globalising the ‘war on terror’? An analysis of 36 countries

“…The war on terror discourse, in contrast, highlights the globally networked nature, capability and lethality of terrorism, in turn legitimising military interventions, increased surveillance and a strengthening of the security apparatus. 16 In this vein, Bhatia argues that 'certain states have quickly adopted and adapted to US terrorist rhetoric to describe their own internal opponents [. .…”