A Short Form of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems Circumples Scales

Soldz, Stephen; Budman, Simon H.; Demby, Annette; Merry, Jocelyn

doi:10.1177/1073191195002001006

Cited by 202 publications

(127 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

124

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The IIP is a self-report measure assessing eight dimensions of interpersonal problems: Domineering/Controlling, Vindictive/Self-Centred, Cold/Distant, Socially Inhibited, Non-Assertive, Overly Accommodating, Self-Sacrificing, and Intrusive/Needy, with subscale scores ranging from 0 to 32 and a total score range of 0–256. The reliability of the Dutch IIP-64 (Cronbach’s α range .73–.85 for subscales and .93–.94 for the total score; [47, 48]) and original IIP-32 (Cronbach’s α range .68–.88 for subscales and .73–.85 for the total score; [49]) are good. In the current sample Cronbach’s α was high for the total score for both the 64-item and 32-item version; α = .94 and α = .81 respectivly.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Subtypes of borderline personality disorder patients: a cluster-analytic approach

Smits

Feenstra

Bales

et al. 2017

bord personal disord emot dysregul

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundThe borderline personality disorder (BPD) population is notably heterogeneous, and this has potentially important implications for intervention. Identifying distinct subtypes of patients may represent a first step in identifying which treatments work best for which individuals.MethodsA cluster-analysis on dimensional personality disorder (PD) features, as assessed with the SCID-II, was performed on a sample of carefully screened BPD patients (N = 187) referred for mentalization-based treatment. The optimal cluster solution was determined using multiple indices of fit. The validity of the clusters was explored by investigating their relationship with borderline pathology, symptom severity, interpersonal problems, quality of life, personality functioning, attachment, and trauma history, in addition to demographic and clinical features.ResultsA three-cluster solution was retained, which identified three clusters of BPD patients with distinct profiles. The largest cluster (n = 145) consisted of patients characterized by “core BPD” features, without marked elevations on other PD dimensions. A second “Extravert/externalizing” cluster of patients (n = 27) was characterized by high levels of histrionic, narcissistic, and antisocial features. A third, smaller “Schizotypal/paranoid” cluster (n = 15) consisted of patients with marked schizotypal and paranoid features. Patients in these clusters showed theoretically meaningful differences in terms of demographic and clinical features.ConclusionsThree meaningful subtypes of BPD patients were identified with distinct profiles. Differences were small, even when controlling for severity of PD pathology, suggesting a strong common factor underlying BPD. These results may represent a stepping stone toward research with larger samples aimed at replicating the findings and investigating differential trajectories of change, treatment outcomes, and treatment approaches for these subtypes.Trial registrationThe study was retrospectively registered 16 April 2010 in the Nederlands Trial Register, no. NTR2292.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Subtypes of borderline personality disorder patients: a cluster-analytic approach

Smits

Feenstra

Bales

et al. 2017

bord personal disord emot dysregul

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Interpersonal problems were measured using the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems – Circumplex Scales Short Form (IIP-SC; Soldz et al, 1995). The IIP-SC is a 32-item self-report inventory of interpersonal problems.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Daily Interpersonal and Affective Dynamics in Personality Disorder

Wright

Hopwood

Simms

2015

Journal of Personality Disorders

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this naturalistic study we adopt the lens of interpersonal theory to examine between-and within-person differences in dynamic processes of daily affect and interpersonal behaviors among individuals (N = 101) previously diagnosed with personality disorders who completed daily diaries over the course of 100 days. Dispositional ratings of interpersonal problems and measures of daily stress were used as predictors of daily shifts in interpersonal behavior and affect in multilevel models. Results indicate that ~40%–50% of the variance in interpersonal behavior and affect is due to daily fluctuations, which are modestly related to dispositional measures of interpersonal problems but strongly related to daily stress. The findings support conceptions of personality disorders as a dynamic form of psychopathology involving the individuals interacting with and regulating in response to the contextual features of their environment.

show abstract

“…The alpha coefficients for these scales ranged from .77 to .95. The Inventory of Interpersonal Problems-Short Circumplex (IIP-SC; Hopwood et al 2008;Soldz et al 1995) is a 32-item measure of interpersonal problems. Its total score (alpha = .90) represents interpersonal distress.…”

Section: Sample 1 Criterion Measuresmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Comparison of Three Self-Report Measures of the Broader Autism Phenotype in a Non-Clinical Sample

Ingersoll

Hopwood

Wainer

et al. 2011

J Autism Dev Disord

144

116

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Three self-report measures of the broader autism phenotype (BAP) were evaluated in terms of their internal consistency, distribution of scores, factor structure, and criterion-related validity in a non-clinical sample. All measures showed a continuous distribution. The SRS-A and BAPQ showed expected sex differences and were superior to the AQ in terms of internal consistency. The proposed factor structure of the BAPQ replicated better than the proposed structures of the other measures. All measures showed evidence of criterion validity via correlations with related constructs and each measure incremented the others in predicting related constructs. However, the SRS-A and BAPQ were generally stronger in this domain. Recommendations for the use of these instruments for measuring the BAP in non-clinical populations are discussed.

show abstract

A Short Form of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems Circumples Scales

Cited by 202 publications

References 14 publications

Subtypes of borderline personality disorder patients: a cluster-analytic approach

Subtypes of borderline personality disorder patients: a cluster-analytic approach

Daily Interpersonal and Affective Dynamics in Personality Disorder

A Comparison of Three Self-Report Measures of the Broader Autism Phenotype in a Non-Clinical Sample

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About