Adopting the interdisciplinary approach of historiography, gender history and book history, the essay sheds new light on the gendered nature of historical authorship in the late-Victorian era. By analysing how historians used such paratexts as title pages, dedications and prefaces for self-fashioning, the aim is to illustrate how paratexts contributed to the gendered idea of historical authority. As men decorated title pages with academic degrees and appointments, their title pages became symbols of scholarly excellence, strengthening the idea of history as a male preserve. Thus, it is necessary to ask how women, largely excluded from such formal qualifications, used paratexts for presenting themselves as authoritative historians. By examining the paratexts of Kate Norgate, Mary Hickson and Alice Gardner, the essay demonstrates that women borrowed authority from renowned male historians to sanction their scholarly competence. Consequently, this practise strengthened the gendered image of scholarly authority since the dedications and prefatorial acknowledgments guided reviewers to measure women historians against the male authorities enlisted in the paratexts. Thus, it is argued here that the paradox was that as women's engagement in historical research expanded, they were nonetheless submitted to the very male authority that their paratexts established. When William Stubbs, a major figurehead of history, published in 1900 Seventeen Lectures on the Study of Mediaeval and Modern History, he invested its title page with an astounding number of seventeen attributes that promoted his scholarly merits and authority. Readers learned that he was Bishop of Oxford, an honorary Student of Christ Church, the late Regius Professor of Modern History, a recipient of five honorary doctorates, a member of numerous international academies and a recipient of the prestigious Knight of the Prussian Order's Pour le Mérite. This register of achievements created such a textually and visually arresting effect that it prompted one reader to scribble 'wow!' next to the public celebration of Stubbs's academic excellence. 1 Stubbs and other professional historians conceived a title page to be what Whitney Trettien describes as an encoded paratextual space serving 'a critical