“…Glaciological modeling has benefited from significant advancements over the last two decades, including the increased availability of ground‐ and space‐based observations [e.g., Bamber and Rivera , 2007; Arendt et al , 2009; Braithwaite , 2009; Zemp et al , 2009], accessibility of high resolution surface and subsurface topographic data [e.g., Arnold et al , 2006; Mottram et al , 2009; Le Brocq et al , 2010], introduction of climate reanalysis products [e.g., Hanna et al , 2005; Radić and Hock , 2006; Rye et al , 2010], and exponential growth in computing power [e.g., Blatter et al , 2010; Pollard , 2010]. This has resulted in a trend toward models of ever‐increasing complexity that are built around physical (rather than empirical) relationships and are implemented at ever‐higher spatial and temporal resolutions [e.g., Arnold and Rees , 2009; Ettema et al , 2009].…”