2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.disc.2012.07.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A short proof of the versatile version of Fleischner’s theorem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fairly recent development in hamiltonian graph theory has shown a resurgence of interest in hamiltonian cycles and paths in the square of 2-connected graphs (which we call 2-blocks for short). In particular, short proofs have been found for two results of the second author of the present paper, [10,11]. And more recently, in [1] the authors develop algorithms which are linear in |E(G)| and produce a hamiltonian cycle, a hamiltonian path joining arbitrary vertices u and v respectively, in G 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Fairly recent development in hamiltonian graph theory has shown a resurgence of interest in hamiltonian cycles and paths in the square of 2-connected graphs (which we call 2-blocks for short). In particular, short proofs have been found for two results of the second author of the present paper, [10,11]. And more recently, in [1] the authors develop algorithms which are linear in |E(G)| and produce a hamiltonian cycle, a hamiltonian path joining arbitrary vertices u and v respectively, in G 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The result by Fleischner in [6] concerning the existence of a hamiltonian cycle (a [2,2]-factor) in the square of 2-connected graph is well known. Recently, Müttel and Rautenbach in [12] gave a shorter proof of this result. Theorem 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…However, since the 1990's shorter proofs of what has become known as Fleischner's Theorem, were developed first byŘíha in [16] and later by Georgakopoulos in [11]. A short proof of an even stronger version of that theorem was proved by Müttel and Rautenbach in [13]. Unfortunately, the methods developed for these shorter proofs do not seem to suffice to prove the main result of this paper (Theorem 4).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%