2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2015.07.560
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Short Survey on the Usage of Choquet Integral and its Associated Fuzzy Measure in Multiple Attribute Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although both of these integral methods are fuzzy and popular, Choquet fuzzy integrals have been more widely applied than Sugeno integrals [17]. A Choquet integral is an aggregation method that simultaneously considers the importance of a classifier and its interaction with other classifiers [18].…”
Section: B Fuzzy Integralmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although both of these integral methods are fuzzy and popular, Choquet fuzzy integrals have been more widely applied than Sugeno integrals [17]. A Choquet integral is an aggregation method that simultaneously considers the importance of a classifier and its interaction with other classifiers [18].…”
Section: B Fuzzy Integralmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, a respondent 1 who participated in a particular MADM analysis is required to provide 2 amount of data in the process of estimating the importance values of all possible combinations of the attributes (Bottero, 2013). Undoubtedly, this process can become a very arduous assignment, especially if the number of evaluation attributes, n involved in the analysis is sufficiently large (Kojadinovic, 2008;Krishnan et al, 2015). Many patterns of fuzzy measure have been introduced in order to reduce the complexity involved in the process of determining the general fuzzy measure values and λ-measure is one such pattern.…”
Section: Choquet Integral and -Measurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, additive operators presume that attributes are always independent to each other. This assumption is inapt with real scenario where the features hold interactive characteristics [57]. Therefore, aggregation should not be always carried out using additive operators.…”
Section: Feature Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the application of Choquet integral can generate more practical outcomes as most of the multiple feature problems involve numbers which have a real meaning (interval or ratio level of measurement) where cardinal aggregation is intended, unlike Sugeno integral which is more suitable for ordinal aggregation where only the order of the elements is important. Secondly, Choquet integral has the merit in producing unique solution in contrast to Sugeno integral [57]. According to a comparison study between Choquet and Sugeno integrals as aggregation operators for pattern recognition, done by Martinez and al.…”
Section: Feature Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%