A Short Version of the International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12) for Use in Routine Clinical Practice

Griffin, Damian R.; Parsons, Nicholas R.; Mohtadi, Nicholas G.; Safran, Marc R.

doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2012.02.027

Cited by 357 publications

(310 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

299

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The iHOT-33 has an MCID of 6 points [45•]. A shorter version of the iHOT-33 was also recently developed, the iHOT-12, with retention of reliability, responsiveness, and validity [46]. The authors of iHOT scores recommend iHOT-12 for routine clinical practice and iHOT-33 for research.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Treatment of femoroacetabular impingement: a systematic review

Harris

Erickson

Bush‐Joseph

et al. 2013

Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this review is to determine if there is a difference in outcomes after: (1) nonsurgical vs surgical treatment of FAI; (2a) surgical dislocation with greater trochanteric osteotomy, (2b) anterior mini-open, (2c) arthroscopic plus mini-open, and (2d) arthroscopic surgery for FAI; (3) difference in complication and re-operation rates; and (4a) labral refixation and (4b) labral debridement for labral injuries. A systematic review of multiple databases was performed after PROSPERO registration and using PRISMA guidelines. Level I-IV evidence clinical studies with minimum 2-year follow-up were included. Data were compared using 2-sample and 2-proportion Z-test calculators. Study methodological quality was analyzed using Modified Coleman Methodology Score (MCMS). Recommendations were made using SORT (Strength Of Recommendation Taxonomy). Twenty-nine studies were included (2369 subjects; 2507 hips). MCMS was poor. Mean subject age was 34.4+/−8.4 years and mean follow-up was 3.1+/−0.9 years. Statistically significant differences were observed following both nonsurgical and surgical treatment, with greater (P< 0.05) improvements following surgery (SORT B), without consistent significant differences observed between different surgical techniques (SORT C). There was a greater (P<0.05) reoperation and complication rate following surgical dislocation vs mini-open and arthroscopic techniques (SORT A). Clinical outcomes were significantly better (P<0.05) following labral refixation vs debridement (SORT B). Outcomes of operative treatment of femoroacetabular impingement are significantly better than nonsurgical management. Surgical treatment significantly improves outcomes, with no consistent significant differences exhibited between open and arthroscopic techniques. Open surgical dislocation has significantly greater reoperation and complication rates vs miniopen and arthroscopic techniques. Outcomes of labral refixation are significantly better than debridement in patients with labral injuries.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Treatment of femoroacetabular impingement: a systematic review

Harris

Erickson

Bush‐Joseph

et al. 2013

Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…On the other hand, physicians are increasingly being held accountable for tracking outcomes as payers tie reimbursement to quality, cost, and outcomes metrics. This realization has prompted the development of shortened versions of many outcome instruments to reduce the financial and administrative burden of utilization while retaining, as much as possible, the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the original [5,14,15].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Knee Society Short Form Reduces Respondent Burden in the Assessment of Patient-reported Outcomes

Scuderi

Sikorskii

Bourne

et al. 2016

Clinical Orthopaedics &Amp; Related Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…All clinical evaluation forms were completed at each visit by two experienced surgeons (D.V.S.P., M.M.S) who was not involved in the surgeries. Clinical assessment was performed through the modified Harris Hip Score [6] (mhhs), a self-administered Hip Outcome Score [7] (HOS) questionnaire, with activity of daily living (ADL) and sports subscale (SSS) translated into Spanish and validated [8], and a self-administered short version of the International Hip Outcome Tool [9] (ihot-12).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Short-term outcomes predictors of hip arthroscopy in male patients aged 50 or younger

Martínez¹

2017

JESO

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A Short Version of the International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12) for Use in Routine Clinical Practice

Cited by 357 publications

References 5 publications

Treatment of femoroacetabular impingement: a systematic review

Treatment of femoroacetabular impingement: a systematic review

The Knee Society Short Form Reduces Respondent Burden in the Assessment of Patient-reported Outcomes

Short-term outcomes predictors of hip arthroscopy in male patients aged 50 or younger

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About