2018
DOI: 10.1109/tie.2018.2813991
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Signal-Based Fault Detection and Tolerance Control Method of Current Sensor for PMSM Drive

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the simulation and analysis of the above three modes of failure, the effectiveness of the fault diagnosis and active fault-tolerant control strategy proposed in this paper is verified. According to the above waveforms and data, it is not difficult to find that from the perspective of control objective, both the composite sliding mode observer control system proposed in this paper and the multi-observer control system based on [10,12] can realize diagnosis and fault-tolerant control under current and speed sensor faults, as shown in Figure 9a,b and Figure 10a,b. From the perspective of control accuracy, the composite sliding mode observer control system has higher precision and lower probability of misdiagnosis or missed diagnosis, and thus reducing the chattering phenomenon of the system considerably, as shown in Figure 9c,d, Figure 10c,d, Figures 11a and 10d.…”
Section: Speed Sensor Constant Gain Faultmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on the simulation and analysis of the above three modes of failure, the effectiveness of the fault diagnosis and active fault-tolerant control strategy proposed in this paper is verified. According to the above waveforms and data, it is not difficult to find that from the perspective of control objective, both the composite sliding mode observer control system proposed in this paper and the multi-observer control system based on [10,12] can realize diagnosis and fault-tolerant control under current and speed sensor faults, as shown in Figure 9a,b and Figure 10a,b. From the perspective of control accuracy, the composite sliding mode observer control system has higher precision and lower probability of misdiagnosis or missed diagnosis, and thus reducing the chattering phenomenon of the system considerably, as shown in Figure 9c,d, Figure 10c,d, Figures 11a and 10d.…”
Section: Speed Sensor Constant Gain Faultmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Though it is simple and satisfies the requirements of corresponding systems for stable operation under current sensor fault, it cannot be applied universally due to the great difference in the current reconstruction methods of different systems. (2) The Luenberger-based observer method [9][10][11]. In this method, the establishment of the Luenberger observer can solve the universality problem effectively, but the observer is highly susceptible to the influence of parameter changes and external disturbances, which may even cause misdiagnosis or missed diagnosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sensor faults are investigated in [11] and exhibited as: (1) sensor gain drop Type a; (2) bias in sensor measurement Type b and (3) complete sensor outage Type c . Type b and Type a faults can be modeled as an addictive fault in sensor measurements y m (k) = y r (k) + f (k) (1) in which y m (k), y r (k) and f (k) denote the faulty measurements, nominal values and fault signals respectively. Type a fault is the sensor gain degradation and modeled as a multiplicative fault in [2] y m (k) = β (k) y r (k) .…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the high power density and efficiency, permanent magnet synchronous generator based wind turbines are promising in wind conversion systems (WECSs) with variable speed operation and full-scale power delivery [1,2]. To fulfill control demands for maximum power point tracking (MPPT) and grid codes, closed-loop feedback control is designed, relying on the mechanical, current and voltage measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of instrumentation and automation for modern industrial processes in the chemical and general manufacturing industries allows large quantities of data to be utilized for assessing current operating conditions (Kruger & Xie, 2012;Severson, Chaiwatanodom & Braatz, 2016). Traditional approaches to monitor general processes include model-based (Ding, 2013;Zhong, Xue & Ding, 2018;Liu, Luo, Yang & Wu, 2016;Li, Gao, Shi & Lam, 2016;Zhao, Yang, Ding & Li, 2018), signal-based (Lei, Lin, He & Zuo, 2013;Yan, Gao & Chen, 2014;Fan, Cai, Zhu, Shen, Huang & Shang, 2015;Wu, Guo, Xie, Ni & Liu, 2018), and knowledge-based (Gao, Cecati & Ding, 2015;Mohammadi & Montazeri-Gh, 2015;Chiremsel,  Corresponding Authors: +86-25-8489-3221, q.chen@nuaa.edu.cn (Qian Chen); +1-518-276-4818, krugeu@rpi.edu (Uwe Kruger) Said & Chiremsel, 2016;Davies, Jackson & Dunnett, 2017) techniques. Based on their conceptual simplicity, techniques that relate to multivariate statistical process control (MSPC) (Kruger & Xie, 2012;Qin, 2012;Ge, Song & Gao, 2013;Yin, Li, Gao & Kaynak, 2015) have also gained attention over the past few decades, particularly for applications to industrial processes that produce larger variable sets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%