1982
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0493(1982)110<0001:astfpc>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Significance Test for Principal Components Applied to a Cyclone Climatology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
188
0
5

Year Published

1996
1996
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 420 publications
(196 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
188
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…A subjective stage of this objective method is the decision for the number, m, of the retained factors. Many criteria have been proposed (Jolliffe, 1986;Overland and Preisendorfer, 1982;Rogers, 1990) but as some are stringent and some others are loose (Thurston and Spengler, 1985), they hardly indicate the same number of factors. In this respect, Jolliffe (1993) states "...different objectives for an analysis may lead to different rule being appropriate".…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A subjective stage of this objective method is the decision for the number, m, of the retained factors. Many criteria have been proposed (Jolliffe, 1986;Overland and Preisendorfer, 1982;Rogers, 1990) but as some are stringent and some others are loose (Thurston and Spengler, 1985), they hardly indicate the same number of factors. In this respect, Jolliffe (1993) states "...different objectives for an analysis may lead to different rule being appropriate".…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Apart from the selection of the optimum number of factors, another outstanding by-product of this methodology was the assessment of the various criteria. It was revealed that our results were very close to the ones given by MCT (Overland and Preisendorfer, 1982), which we eventually applied in this work. This criterion is designed to determine whether the factors' eigenvalues for a geophysical data set can be distinguished from those drawn at random.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The values of each factor are called factor scores and they are usually presented in standardized form, having zero mean and unit variance (Jolliffe, 1986;Manly, 1986). The number m of the retained factors has to be decided, by using various rules (Overland and Preisendorfer, 1982;Jolliffe, 1986) and considering the physical interpretation of the results . A widely used process is the rotation of axes, which creates new factors with different variances, but it keeps the cumulative variance of the m factors unaffected.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The question is whether the second mode, representing only 5% of the variability, is significant or not. A Monte-Carlo simulation analysis [Overland and Preisendorfer, 1982] was applied by running i00 simulations of the CEOF analysis on Gaussian random numbers with a standard deviation of 5. None of the resulting random modes explain >6% (Figure 6).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%