2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jlumin.2010.03.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple 1,10-phenanthroline-based fluorescent receptor in solution and 1,10-phenanthroline in solid state for urea recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
4
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In excellent agreement with the experimental structures, geometry optimizations for the monocations [Co­(tpy) 2 ] + , [Co­(bpy) 3 ] + , and [Co­(phen) 3 ] + yielded ligands that appear to be coordinated in their neutral forms, thereby rendering the central metal ion Co I (d 8 , S = 1). More specifically, the C py –C py and C–N chel bond distances within each complex are, within experimental error limits (3σ ∼ 0.01 Å), identical and agree well with those reported for the uncoordinated neutral ligands tpy 0 , bpy 0 , and phen 0 . Consistent with this statement, the occupied FMOs (Figures and S15 and S20) have predominant 3d orbital character.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In excellent agreement with the experimental structures, geometry optimizations for the monocations [Co­(tpy) 2 ] + , [Co­(bpy) 3 ] + , and [Co­(phen) 3 ] + yielded ligands that appear to be coordinated in their neutral forms, thereby rendering the central metal ion Co I (d 8 , S = 1). More specifically, the C py –C py and C–N chel bond distances within each complex are, within experimental error limits (3σ ∼ 0.01 Å), identical and agree well with those reported for the uncoordinated neutral ligands tpy 0 , bpy 0 , and phen 0 . Consistent with this statement, the occupied FMOs (Figures and S15 and S20) have predominant 3d orbital character.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“… As a search of the Cambridge Crystallographic Database reveals, these dications have been structurally characterized many times in the past, and structures for the aforementioned purpose have been selected based on the following criteria: (1) no static disorder problems are present; (2) data collection was preferably performed at cryogenic temperatures (100–150 K); (3) the estimated standard deviations (σ) for the C–C and C–N bond lengths should not exceed 0.005 Å; (4) the R factor should be less than 5%. The experimentally observed average Ni–N, C py –C py , and C–N chel bond lengths in the selected nickel­(II) structures (Table S24) match exactly, within an error limit of ±0.01 Å, those of the cobalt­(I) complexes and those reported for the uncoordinated ligands. ,, Thus, the Co I monocations and corresponding Ni II dications are isostructural and isoelectronic.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The first three hosts used (Chart ) , were Thummel’s host 1 , based on the acidity of indolic N–H in lieu of amides N–H; and hosts 2 and 3 were previously reported by Goswami et al , Many other hosts for ureas recognition were described in chronological order by Goswami; , by Gozin; by Gale; by Boyer; by Ghosh and Sen; , Goswami; by Yatsimirsky; by Roesky; and by Ghosh . Some hosts were prepared by Ghosh specifically for biotin salt, while related pyridine-based oligoamides were prepared by Gunnlaugsson as DNA-targeting supramolecular binders …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%