1986
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9991(86)90267-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple adaptive technique for nonlinear wave problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In practice, the adaptive solution process was implemented using MATLAB [16] and the COM-SOL Multiphysics finite element package [17]. The grid generation follows the method presented by Sanz-Serna and Christie in [18] which is equivalent to equidistributing the arc-length monitor function given by (10) 4 Analysis of mesh convergence…”
Section: Adaptive Solution Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, the adaptive solution process was implemented using MATLAB [16] and the COM-SOL Multiphysics finite element package [17]. The grid generation follows the method presented by Sanz-Serna and Christie in [18] which is equivalent to equidistributing the arc-length monitor function given by (10) 4 Analysis of mesh convergence…”
Section: Adaptive Solution Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning the grid determination, our algorithm can be classified as belonging to the class of methods which are "intermediate" between the static regridding methods, where nodes remain fixed for intervals of time [ 14,[22][23][24], and continuously moving grid methods, where the node movement and the PDE integration are fully coupled [2,10,17,18,20,26]. We have successfully applied this "intermediate" approach in [5,6].…”
Section: The "Intermediate" Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These schemes are "intermediate" between the static regridding methods [ 14,[22][23][24], where nodes remain fixed for intervals of time, and continuously moving grid methods, where the node movement and the PDE integration are fully coupled [2,10,17,18,20,26]. While the research in [5,6] has enabled us to identify a promising scheme, the implementation considered in those papers used fixed time-steps and did not allow a dynamic variation of the number of spatial grid-points.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In situations where the unknown u is a vector, the foregoing ideas still apply, provided that the bars in ( 3.3 )-(3.4) are understood to denote some suitable vector norm. It should be stressed that, although the introduction of the new variables (s, T) is helpful in the previous discussions, the computation of the grid {x;' }, at least for n "::3 1, can be completely achieved in terms of the old variables (Furzeland [7], Sanz-Serna and Christie [17]). To this effect it is enough to replace (3.2) by the midpoint quadrature, leading to the set of relations ( X;r1+X; )…”
Section: Equidistribution Of the Second Derivativementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here the solution is advanced in time on a fixed nonuniform grid, while after each step, or series of steps, a regridding is carried out which is in turn followed by an interpolation to generate the initial values for the next step. Some recent contributions in this area are Bieterman and Babuska [2], Furzeland [7], Sanz-Serna and Christie [ 17 ], and Revilla [ 15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%