2010
DOI: 10.3189/172756410791386481
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple analytical model for pressure on obstacles induced by snow avalanches

Abstract: ABSTRACT. The forces snow avalanches are able to exert on protection dams or buildings are of crucial interest in order to improve avalanche mitigation measures and to quantify the mechanical vulnerability of structures likely to be damaged by snow avalanches. This paper presents an analytical model that is able to calculate these forces taking into account dead-zone mechanisms. First, we present a 2-D analytical hydrodynamic model describing the forces on a wall overflown by gravity-driven flows down an incli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Dimensional analysis has led to the proposal that the Froude number is a natural candidate for describing flow dynamics [ Salm , ; Grigorian , ; Bozhinskiy and Losev , ; Faug et al , ] and thus the drag force has also been expressed as a function of the Froude number: σn=12Cd(Fr)ρu2, …”
Section: Avalanche Forcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dimensional analysis has led to the proposal that the Froude number is a natural candidate for describing flow dynamics [ Salm , ; Grigorian , ; Bozhinskiy and Losev , ; Faug et al , ] and thus the drag force has also been expressed as a function of the Froude number: σn=12Cd(Fr)ρu2, …”
Section: Avalanche Forcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, while the impact of a falling rock on a net can be impulsive and punctual (a time domain of a few milliseconds), the interaction of a debris flow with a flexible barrier is more complex, and few recent studies have been conducted to help to understand the impact dynamics, to develop rigorous and useful guidelines, or to establish new verification criteria (Faug et al, 2009(Faug et al, , 2010Federico and Amoruso, 2009;Hübl et al, 2009;Teufelsbauer et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study clearly points at the shortcoming of the snow engineering classical approach. Attention should be also paid on the following points: (i) the influence of more complex material properties (cohesion, clustering) on the closure equations in order to apprehend more complex granular materials close to natural ones, (ii) the more complex flow and obstacle geometries with possible lateral overflows (see a preliminary attempt in [7]) and (iii) the fluid/structure coupling processes which can influence the force the obstacle is likely to undergo (the wall was fixed and rigid), particularly in the context of force fluctuations (see Fig. 3) which were not tackled within the time-average hydrodynamic approach presented in this paper.…”
Section: Discussion and Conclusion: Contribution To Avalanche Dam Designmentioning
confidence: 99%