2014
DOI: 10.2147/ca.s50979
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple and effective strategy for improving junior doctors' knowledge of intravenous fluid therapy

Abstract: Clinical Audit Dovepress submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress 1 S h o rt r e p o rt open access to scientific and medical research open Access Full text Article Background: The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of a single focused teaching session in improving junior doctors' knowledge of intravenous fluid therapy. Methods: A questionnaire was developed from the current national guidelines on perioperative intravenous fluid therapy, ie, the 2008 British Consensus Guidelines … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Foundation knowledge of biochemistry and physiology underpinning IV fluid prescribing, however, varied widely between educational institutions, specialties, and levels of experience [ 2 , 29 , 47 , 59 63 ]. Education to improve IV fluid prescribing was primarily didactic teaching to resolve these deficiencies [ 29 , 40 , 61 , 64 66 ]. While test scores improved and self-reported practice in the short term increased, there was no information about its longer-term effects on knowledge or clinical performance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Foundation knowledge of biochemistry and physiology underpinning IV fluid prescribing, however, varied widely between educational institutions, specialties, and levels of experience [ 2 , 29 , 47 , 59 63 ]. Education to improve IV fluid prescribing was primarily didactic teaching to resolve these deficiencies [ 29 , 40 , 61 , 64 66 ]. While test scores improved and self-reported practice in the short term increased, there was no information about its longer-term effects on knowledge or clinical performance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%