1998
DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1998.2292
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple and efficient method for the isolation of differentially expressed genes 1 1Edited by J. Karn

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This produces a subset of 10-60 bands of amplified cDNAs (the profile or index), allowing a comparison between two mRNA populations. The falsepositive rate using this technique is said to be greatly reduced compared to the conventional DD (Mahadeva et al 1998).…”
Section: Dd-based Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This produces a subset of 10-60 bands of amplified cDNAs (the profile or index), allowing a comparison between two mRNA populations. The falsepositive rate using this technique is said to be greatly reduced compared to the conventional DD (Mahadeva et al 1998).…”
Section: Dd-based Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 Differential display is a less laborious and more widely used approach, 11 and has yielded promising results, particularly with an adapted indexing based differential display PCR (DD-PCR) technique. 12 Standard differential display techniques involve conversion of RNA to cDNA, which is then split into a series of reactions involving a specific reverse primer and a random forward primer. Amplification of only a limited subset of the RNA present produces a specific RNA ladder for a given primer combination and tissue.…”
Section: Differential Displaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was performed as described previously [11]. Briefly, double‐stranded cDNA produced in parallel from 27 μg of pooled ( n =10 animals per group) total LV RNA from 4 h sham and banded groups, was digested with the class IIS enzyme Bbv I before ligation to pools of tagged adapters with sequence‐specific four‐base overhangs of all possible sequences.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent advances in molecular techniques have led to the evolution of expression profiling methods such as differential display [7], serial analysis of gene expression [8], molecular indexing [9] and cDNA array screening [10], enabling a more comprehensive assessment of gene expression in disease states. We have developed an efficient method of expression profiling using the principle of molecular indexing [11]. In the present study, we have applied molecular indexing to study the early stages of pressure‐induced LVH in a rat model of aortic banding, in order to identify novel regulatory molecules involved in the initial signalling that leads to the development of LVH.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%