2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2009.08.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple and highly effective process for the purification of single-walled carbon nanotubes synthesized with arc-discharge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…19−21 However, even if high-quality CNTs can be prepared from the standard methods, they still fail in selectively removing carbonaceous impurities without excessive loss of CNTs, leading to low sample yield. 22 The main reason explaining this difficulty of eliminating carbon impurities without attacking the CNTs is their too close chemical reactivity. 23,24 Standard approaches use strong acids, which are known to damage the CNTs and lead to weak sample yield; they also create functional groups at the CNT surface and produce large amounts of amorphous carbon debris.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…19−21 However, even if high-quality CNTs can be prepared from the standard methods, they still fail in selectively removing carbonaceous impurities without excessive loss of CNTs, leading to low sample yield. 22 The main reason explaining this difficulty of eliminating carbon impurities without attacking the CNTs is their too close chemical reactivity. 23,24 Standard approaches use strong acids, which are known to damage the CNTs and lead to weak sample yield; they also create functional groups at the CNT surface and produce large amounts of amorphous carbon debris.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purification of CNTs has been extensively desired, and various methods allow to efficiently remove metallic contamination. , Some methods to remove only catalyst residues consist of annealing the CNT powder at a temperature in the 2000–2500 °C range under N 2 , Ar, or vacuum. However, even if high-quality CNTs can be prepared from the standard methods, they still fail in selectively removing carbonaceous impurities without excessive loss of CNTs, leading to low sample yield . The main reason explaining this difficulty of eliminating carbon impurities without attacking the CNTs is their too close chemical reactivity. , Standard approaches use strong acids, which are known to damage the CNTs and lead to weak sample yield; they also create functional groups at the CNT surface and produce large amounts of amorphous carbon debris .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By using a specific chelator for Fe(II) associated to a reducing agent iron was found in large part exposed to the solvent and therefore potentially active toward cells (Table 1). Several protocols were proposed to remove metal contaminants from MWCNT (Cho et al, 2009), that include chemical treatments with oxidizing acids (HNO 3 , H 2 SO 4 ) or thermal treatments at high temperature in inert atmosphere (Bougrine et al, 2001;Fenoglio et al, 2008). However these treatments also affect the total amount of defects of CNT.…”
Section: Preparation Of Iron-rich and Iron-free Mwcntmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The asproduced soot persistently contains a part of nonnanotube species: (i) carbonaceous impurities showing large range of size and cristallinity from completely amorphous carbon to more or less ordered or well-graphitized particles and (ii) particles of residual metal catalyst required for the synthesis of SWNT-type. Numerous treatments and procedures for mass purification have been proposed, they are based on physical processes and/or chemical treatments (Hou et al, 2008;Cho et al, 2009). The physical methods are based on the difference in size, density, aspect ratio, magnetic properties between the impurities and the CNTs.…”
Section: Purification and Puritymentioning
confidence: 99%