A Simple And Implementation of Interleaved Boost Converter For Renewable Energy

Sunarno, Epyk; Sudiharto, Indhana; Nugraha, Syechu Dwitya; Qudsi, Ony Asrarul; Eviningsih, Rachma Prilian; Raharja, Lucky Pradigta Setiya; Arifin, Indra Fardhani

doi:10.1109/icseea.2018.8627094

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Depending on safety standards and/or voltage level requirements, different topologies, namely with or without galvanic isolation, can be employed. A boost converter is often used topology without galvanic isolation [7][8][9][10], while full bridge and push-pull (Figure 1) topologies are selected when galvanic isolation is required or when the ratio between input and output voltage is high enough to bring in some safety concerns [10][11][12][13]. The push-pull converter is simpler from the control standpoint in comparison to full bridge topology.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Modeling Push–Pull Converter for Efficiency Improvement

Ivanovic

Knezic

2022

Electronics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this paper, we model and analyze the power losses of push–pull converters. The proposed model considers conduction and dynamic power losses, as well as transformer and inductor losses. Transformer and inductor models include skin and proximity effects, as well as power losses in the core. Moreover, the model includes the diode recovery time losses. We derived the equations for both continuous and discontinuous current operating modes. All model parameters can be obtained either from the datasheets of the used components or by simple measurement techniques. The model is verified experimentally by measuring the efficiency of the 500 W push–pull converter prototype. Simulations and experimental validation are conducted using the assumption that the converter is used in a permanent magnet (PM) wind turbine generator.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Modeling Push–Pull Converter for Efficiency Improvement

Ivanovic

Knezic

2022

Electronics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Numerical results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed controller in supporting constant voltage to resistive loads independent of their variations; however, no comparisons with classical or nonlinear methodologies were provided in this study. Additional control methodologies include sliding control [19,20], ex-act state-feedback control [21,22], Hamiltonian-based controllers [23,24], neural and fuzzy controller designs [25,26], and [27], among others.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

An IDA-PBC Design with Integral Action for Output Voltage Regulation in an Interleaved Boost Converter for DC Microgrid Applications

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper describes the output voltage regulation control for an interleaved connected to a direct current (DC) microgrid considering bidirectional current flows. The proposed controller is based on an interconnection and damping passivity-based control (IDA-PBC) approach with integral action that regulates the output voltage profile at its assigned reference. This approach designs a control law via nonlinear feedback that ensures asymptotic stability in a closed-loop in the sense of Lyapunov. Moreover, the IDA-PBC design adds an integral gain to eliminate the possible tracking errors in steady-state conditions. Numerical simulations in the Piecewise Linear Electrical Circuit Simulation (PLECS) package for MATLAB/Simulink demonstrate that the effectiveness of the proposed controller is assessed and compared with a conventional proportional-integral controller under different scenarios considering strong variations in the current injected/absorbed by the DC microgrid.

show abstract