2006
DOI: 10.1109/ias.2006.256645
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Simple and Reliable PWM Synchronization & Phase-Shift Method for Cascaded H-Bridge Multilevel Inverters based on a Standard Serial Communication Protocol

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PEBBs offer the plug-and-play architecture for various large-scale applications, providing a network with masterslave infrastructure. Several communication protocols have been proposed over the years [171], the important ones are controller area network (CAN) [175], serial real-time communications system (SERCOS) [176], motion and control ring optical (MACRO) [177], [178], [179], which is also an Ethernet communication protocol, MACRO and fiber distributed data interface (FDDI) to form power electronics system network (PESNet) [177], [180], PESNet 1.2 and 2.2 as the very two first communication protocols generated PEBBs [181], process field bus (PROFIBUS) [182], serial peripheral interface (SPI) [183], ethernet for control automation technology (EtherCAT) which interestingly most of the researchers have lately zeroed in on because of real-time capabilities, synchronization performance, fault diagnostics [184], process field net ssochronous real time (PROFINET IRT) [184], Ethernet PowerLink and Ethernet/IP [185], synchronous-converter-control-bus (SyCCo-Bus) [186], and RealSycho [187]. A good comparison between PESNet and SyCCo-Bus protocols has been presented in [188].…”
Section: B Communication Protocols Of Pebbsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PEBBs offer the plug-and-play architecture for various large-scale applications, providing a network with masterslave infrastructure. Several communication protocols have been proposed over the years [171], the important ones are controller area network (CAN) [175], serial real-time communications system (SERCOS) [176], motion and control ring optical (MACRO) [177], [178], [179], which is also an Ethernet communication protocol, MACRO and fiber distributed data interface (FDDI) to form power electronics system network (PESNet) [177], [180], PESNet 1.2 and 2.2 as the very two first communication protocols generated PEBBs [181], process field bus (PROFIBUS) [182], serial peripheral interface (SPI) [183], ethernet for control automation technology (EtherCAT) which interestingly most of the researchers have lately zeroed in on because of real-time capabilities, synchronization performance, fault diagnostics [184], process field net ssochronous real time (PROFINET IRT) [184], Ethernet PowerLink and Ethernet/IP [185], synchronous-converter-control-bus (SyCCo-Bus) [186], and RealSycho [187]. A good comparison between PESNet and SyCCo-Bus protocols has been presented in [188].…”
Section: B Communication Protocols Of Pebbsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the modulation algorithm H-bridge cascade multilevel converter mainly includes: the ladder wave modulation [11], space voltage vector method [12,13] and carrier phase shift PWM method [14,15]. Ladder wave modulation is a baseband modulation method, the switching frequency is low, and conducive to high-power implementation of STATCOM, but the harmonic content of the output voltage is great, only in the case of a large number of level is high-quality output voltage obtained; In contrast, space voltage vector method with a high DC voltage utilization is easy to facilitate the digitization method, but with the increase in the number of output level, especially after more than 5 level, it is difficult to achieve, and the amount of controller operations is increased; CPS-SPWM is a multi-carrier SPWM modulation algorithm.…”
Section: Modulation Algorithm Of H-bridge Cascade Multilevel Conmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phase-shift control is widely used for cascade inverters because it is easy to implement with digital controllers and it equivalently increases the switching frequency by the number of cascade units, which reduces the output voltage and current ripple [25][26][27]. For the cascade dual buck inverter, phase shift control is adopted as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%