2016
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.6b08628
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Simple Approach to Fabricate an Efficient Inverted Polymer Solar Cell with a Novel Small Molecular Electrolyte as the Cathode Buffer Layer

Abstract: A novel small-molecule electrolyte, 1,1'-bis(4-hydroxypropyl)-[4,4'-bipyridine]-1,1'-diium bromide (V-OH), containing a mixture of PTB7:PCBM has been designed and synthesized as a cathode buffer layer for inverted polymer solar cells (iPSCs). The molecular structure of this new compound comprises a viologen skeleton with hydroxyl group terminals. While the viologen unit is responsible for generating a favorable interface dipole, the two terminal hydroxyl groups of V-OH may generate a synergy effect in the magn… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The formation of the interface dipoles leaves a significant influence on the device performance which has been explained through various studies carried out on wide variety of organic materials (Collins et al, 1994; Kaspar et al, 1994; Schmidt et al, 1995a,b; Van Slyke et al, 1996; Katz, 1997; Hiller et al, 1998; Lee et al, 1998, 1999; Chen et al, 2013; Liu C. et al, 2015; Kim et al, 2016a,b; Liu et al, 2016; Zhang et al, 2016; Yang et al, 2017; Yu et al, 2017). It has been reported in these studies that interface dipoles strongly influence the process of charge carrier injection/extraction across the electrode interfaces, which in certain cases can lead to the generation of the S-kink in the current-voltage characteristics of the solar cells.…”
Section: Addressing the Challenge Of Energy Barriersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The formation of the interface dipoles leaves a significant influence on the device performance which has been explained through various studies carried out on wide variety of organic materials (Collins et al, 1994; Kaspar et al, 1994; Schmidt et al, 1995a,b; Van Slyke et al, 1996; Katz, 1997; Hiller et al, 1998; Lee et al, 1998, 1999; Chen et al, 2013; Liu C. et al, 2015; Kim et al, 2016a,b; Liu et al, 2016; Zhang et al, 2016; Yang et al, 2017; Yu et al, 2017). It has been reported in these studies that interface dipoles strongly influence the process of charge carrier injection/extraction across the electrode interfaces, which in certain cases can lead to the generation of the S-kink in the current-voltage characteristics of the solar cells.…”
Section: Addressing the Challenge Of Energy Barriersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been reported in these studies that interface dipoles strongly influence the process of charge carrier injection/extraction across the electrode interfaces, which in certain cases can lead to the generation of the S-kink in the current-voltage characteristics of the solar cells. On the other hand, the formation of the favorable interface dipoles may improve the charge extraction efficiency by minimization of the interfacial energy barriers, therefore increasing the built in potential, and suppressing charge carrier recombination at the interfaces (Chen et al, 2013; Liu C. et al, 2015; Kim et al, 2016a,b; Liu et al, 2016; Zhang et al, 2016; Yang et al, 2017; Yu et al, 2017). Furthermore, the formation of such surface dipoles is also important in organic heterojunctions, which play important role in photovoltage formation and exciton dissociation occurring at this heterojunction interface (Schmidt et al, 1995a,b; Katz, 1997; Hiller et al, 1998).…”
Section: Addressing the Challenge Of Energy Barriersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Reducing the energy gap at the interface and passivation of ZnO surface are important to improve the performances of the devices. Many approaches have been tried to modify the surface of ZnO such as deposition of thin layer of conjugated or non‐conjugated polyelectrolytes (i.e., interlayer), metal chelates, and self‐assembled monolayer (SAM) treatments on the top of the ZnO surface to improve electron collection at the ZnO surface. In case of the former method, the performance of the device is very sensitive to the thickness of the interlayer, which is normally in the range of 5–10 nm and should be optimized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%