65th ARFTG Conference Digest, 2005. Spring 2005
DOI: 10.1109/arftgs.2005.1500560
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple calibration algorithm for partially leaky model multiport vector network analyzers

Abstract: Calibration of leaky multiport vector network analyzers can be a long and time consuming procedure, unless calibration model and number of standard connections are somehow optimized. In this paper we present an optimized solution €or a practical set of multiport problems, where calibration model can be divided in two separate teaky halves, neglecting leakage between them. This problem is typical for multiport onwafer measurements, where mdti-signal probes (e.g. GSGSG) are implied, We will show that with a prop… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some experiments to validate the proposed methodology were performed on a four-port coaxial system [25]. The setup Fig.…”
Section: Coaxial Implementation and Tests Of A Half-leaky Multiportmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Some experiments to validate the proposed methodology were performed on a four-port coaxial system [25]. The setup Fig.…”
Section: Coaxial Implementation and Tests Of A Half-leaky Multiportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [25], a new multiport error model and its calibration procedure, called "half-leaky calibration," were introduced. In this model, the error coefficients are split into two separate leaky halves with the same number of ports.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, it is necessary to find a fitting error model for the setup at hand. Several error models for multiport calibration have been published before [1][2] [5]. All account for directivity errors, source mismatching and tracking errors at all measurement ports.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%