2013
DOI: 10.1109/tii.2012.2224354
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Simple Carrier-Based Modulation for the SVM of the Matrix Converter

Abstract: is an open access repository that collects the work of Arts et Métiers ParisTech researchers and makes it freely available over the web where possible. Any correspondence concerning this service should be sent to the repository Administrator : archiveouverte@ensam.eu 1 Abstract -Today, industry has not fully embraced the matrix converter solution. One important reason is its high control complexity. It is therefore relevant to propose a simpler but efficient modulation scheme, similar as three phase VSI modula… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…for Matrix Converters Scalar Techniques [5], [6] Pulse Width Modulation [7]- [10] Direct Torque Control [11], [12] Direct Power Control [13], [14] Model Predictive Control [15]- [38] Other Methods Direct Transfer Function [5] Scalar (Roy) [6] Carrier Based PWM [7], [8] Space Vector Modulation [9], [10] Predictive Current Control [15]- [24] Predictive Torque Control [25]- [29] Predictive Power Control [30]- [33] Predictive Voltage Control [34]- [36] Unity Transfer [37], [38] [40], [41] Fig. 2.…”
Section: Modulation and Control Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…for Matrix Converters Scalar Techniques [5], [6] Pulse Width Modulation [7]- [10] Direct Torque Control [11], [12] Direct Power Control [13], [14] Model Predictive Control [15]- [38] Other Methods Direct Transfer Function [5] Scalar (Roy) [6] Carrier Based PWM [7], [8] Space Vector Modulation [9], [10] Predictive Current Control [15]- [24] Predictive Torque Control [25]- [29] Predictive Power Control [30]- [33] Predictive Voltage Control [34]- [36] Unity Transfer [37], [38] [40], [41] Fig. 2.…”
Section: Modulation and Control Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As reviewed in [39] and shown in Fig. 2, the most commonly used techniques are Venturini [5], carrier-based pulse width modulation (PWM) [7], [8], space vector modulation (SVM) [9], [10] and direct torque control (DTC) [11], [12]. Other control methods that have been applied to MCs in specific applications are fuzzy control, neural networks and genetic algorithms [40], [41].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that H f (X) is of size n×n. Therefore, the computational complexity of (2) is Θ(n 3 ) where n denotes the number of desired parameters [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39]. In context of LF-based CF described by (1), we have n = (|U|+|I|)d. Thus, with huge user and item counts which are commonly seen in real applications, it is intractable to employ (2) directly.…”
Section: ( )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is to be noted here that the most common configuration of the matrix converter discussed in the literature is three-phase to threephase [2]. Recently, topologies of matrix converter with threephase input and multi-phase outputs have been reported [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. This paper is motivated from the recent development in three-phase input and multi-phase output matrix converter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%