1983
DOI: 10.1109/tit.1983.1056733
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple class of asymptotically optimal quantizers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both studies assume that in representing a cardinality, the neural system maps an input number n to a quantized form n̂ , and that the “right” thing to do is minimize the value of the relative error of the quantization (Sun & Goyal, 2011), given by double-struckEn[nn^2n2] (for history and related results, see Gray & Neuhoff, 1998 ; Cambanis & Gerr, 1983). This is not the same as assuming Weber's law, but rather assumes an objective function (over representations) that is based in relative error.…”
Section: Previous Derivations Of the Logarithmic Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both studies assume that in representing a cardinality, the neural system maps an input number n to a quantized form n̂ , and that the “right” thing to do is minimize the value of the relative error of the quantization (Sun & Goyal, 2011), given by double-struckEn[nn^2n2] (for history and related results, see Gray & Neuhoff, 1998 ; Cambanis & Gerr, 1983). This is not the same as assuming Weber's law, but rather assumes an objective function (over representations) that is based in relative error.…”
Section: Previous Derivations Of the Logarithmic Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using Hölder's inequality, the optimal point density for fixed-rate quantization for each source (communicated with rate ) is asymptotically (24) over the support of , with fMSE (25) Similarly, the best point density for the entropy-constrained case is asymptotically (26) over the support of , leading to a fMSE of (27) We present performance while leaving the fractional allocation as a parameter. Given a total communication rate constraint , we can also optimize .…”
Section: A Asymptotically Optimal Quantizer Sequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We recall the fidelity criterion of interest is fMSE as defined in (1) and the performance of nonuniform scalar quantizers is given in (4)- (6). In this section, we will understand the achievable rate region with respect to fMSE using Theorem 1 and compare the sum rate to the DFSQ results; this determines the rate loss from using scalar quantizers.…”
Section: Rate Loss Of Dfsqmentioning
confidence: 99%