2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00186-019-00685-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple construction of complete single-peaked domains by recursive tiling

Abstract: Single-peakedness was introduced by Black (J Political Econ 56:23-34, 1948) as a sufficient condition to overcome Condorcet paradox. Since then it has been attracting interest from researchers in various fields. In this paper, we propose a simple recursive procedure of constructing complete single-peaked domains of tiling type explicitly for any finite alternative sets, by combining two results published in recent years, and some observations of known results and examples by the author. The underlying basic st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“….ðn þ 1Þ. Zhan (2019) observed this recursive property of the single-peaked domains considering their tilling representations.…”
Section: A New Constructionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“….ðn þ 1Þ. Zhan (2019) observed this recursive property of the single-peaked domains considering their tilling representations.…”
Section: A New Constructionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Several other generalizations of allocation mechanisms with additional conditions or hybrid types have been developed, refer to the papers [2,3,6,9,10,28] and reference therein. Allocating resource summation, similar to the base equality of polymatroids, is treated in a recent paper by Bochet and Tumennasan [29], which is related to single-peakedness, Zhan [30]. Finally, in the case of the dichotomous domain with a matroidal family of goods, we expect the strategy-proofness property to be kept.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The labels on the directed path of each snake form a linear order, or a permutation of alternatives of [n]. Also refer to [7,20] for more details of rhombus tilings and preference domains, refer to [10] for more general linear orders and permutations.…”
Section: Rhombus Tilings Of Preference Domainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…tiles, or reverse pairs, in each tiling on [n]. The right snakes have more inversion pairs than the left ones in a Bruhat poset, all snakes of a tiling also form a lattice [10,20].…”
Section: Rhombus Tilings Of Preference Domainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation