2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2203.07265
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple determination of the halo size $L$ from $^{10}$Be/$^9$Be data

Abstract: Context. The AMS-02 and HELIX experiments should provide soon 10 Be/ 9 Be cosmic-ray data of unprecedented precision. Aims. We propose an analytical formula to quickly and accurately determine L from these data. Methods. Our formula is validated against the full calculation performed with the propagation code usine. We compare the constraints on L set by Be/B and 10 Be/ 9 Be, relying on updated sets of production cross sections.Results. The best-fit L from AMS-02 Be/B data is shifted from 5 kpc to 3.8 kpc when… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 51 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We emphasised that most (and possibly all) previous interpretations of the AMS-02 Li, Be, and B data rely on a cross-section set that does not account for these enhancements. The consequences of using updated cross sections are the following 20 : (i) in the ranking of the most important progenitors for LiBeB, Fe becomes the third most important element, responsible for ∼ 10% of Li and Be 21 , but only ∼ 4% for B; (ii) the combined analysis of the AMS-02 Li/C, Be/C, and B/C ratios lead to a 20% larger value of the diffusion coefficient (compared to those obtained in our previous investigation), which is not without consequences for the predictions made, for instance, on secondary antiprotons (Boudaud et al 2020) 22 ; (iii) the updated cross-section sets also impact the predictions for the isotopic ratios of Li, Be, and B-in particular, uncertainties on the production of Be isotopes may be an issue for the determination of the halo size of the Galaxy (see the companion paper, Maurin et al 2022); (iv) via the inspection of the post-fit values of the nuisance parameters (on the production cross section), we find that the updated cross-section sets, expected to be closer to the truth, indeed provide a more consistent description of the 20 These cross-section sets will appear at some point in the next release of the usine code. They can be obtained on demand in the meantime.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…We emphasised that most (and possibly all) previous interpretations of the AMS-02 Li, Be, and B data rely on a cross-section set that does not account for these enhancements. The consequences of using updated cross sections are the following 20 : (i) in the ranking of the most important progenitors for LiBeB, Fe becomes the third most important element, responsible for ∼ 10% of Li and Be 21 , but only ∼ 4% for B; (ii) the combined analysis of the AMS-02 Li/C, Be/C, and B/C ratios lead to a 20% larger value of the diffusion coefficient (compared to those obtained in our previous investigation), which is not without consequences for the predictions made, for instance, on secondary antiprotons (Boudaud et al 2020) 22 ; (iii) the updated cross-section sets also impact the predictions for the isotopic ratios of Li, Be, and B-in particular, uncertainties on the production of Be isotopes may be an issue for the determination of the halo size of the Galaxy (see the companion paper, Maurin et al 2022); (iv) via the inspection of the post-fit values of the nuisance parameters (on the production cross section), we find that the updated cross-section sets, expected to be closer to the truth, indeed provide a more consistent description of the 20 These cross-section sets will appear at some point in the next release of the usine code. They can be obtained on demand in the meantime.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%