2016
DOI: 10.3389/fbuil.2016.00015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Simple Evaluation Method of Seismic Resistance of Residential House under Two Consecutive Severe Ground Motions with Intensity 7

Abstract: In the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake in Japan, two severe ground shakings with the seismic intensity 7 (the highest level in Japan Meteorological Agency scale; approximately X-XII in Mercalli scale) occurred consecutively on April 14 and 16. In the seismic regulations of most countries, it is usually prescribed that such severe earthquake ground motion occurs once in the working period of buildings. In this paper, a simple evaluation method is presented on the seismic resistance of residential houses under two cons… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another important aspect of the selected records is that KMMH16 is in the hanging wall region of the mainshock (i.e., within a projected fault plane on the ground surface), and thus intense ground shaking was observed during the mainshock. Moreover, at KMMH16, strong shaking due to the foreshock preceded the mainshock, resulting in double-shock ground motions (Kojima and Takewaki, 2016). Figure 5 shows observed acceleration as well as velocity time-histories (three components) at KMMH16 for the foreshock and mainshock.…”
Section: Strong Motion Characteristics In the Near-fault Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another important aspect of the selected records is that KMMH16 is in the hanging wall region of the mainshock (i.e., within a projected fault plane on the ground surface), and thus intense ground shaking was observed during the mainshock. Moreover, at KMMH16, strong shaking due to the foreshock preceded the mainshock, resulting in double-shock ground motions (Kojima and Takewaki, 2016). Figure 5 shows observed acceleration as well as velocity time-histories (three components) at KMMH16 for the foreshock and mainshock.…”
Section: Strong Motion Characteristics In the Near-fault Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During this earthquake, unprecedented large-amplitude ground motions (over 2.0m/s velocity amplitude compared to 0.5m/s for severe earthquake ground motions for tall buildings in Japan), called long-period pulse-type ground motions, were recorded. Since such large-amplitude ground motion is a serious event, the suppression of plastic deformations is strongly desired in view of the resistance and recovery from the viewpoint of earthquake resilience (Kojima and Takewaki, 2016;Ogawa et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, unprecedented large-amplitude ground motions, called long-period pulse-type ground motions, were recorded. Even for such large-amplitude ground motions, the suppression of plastic deformations is strongly recommended in view of the resistance and recovery as the measure of earthquake resilience (Kojima and Takewaki, 2016;Ogawa et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%