2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2021.122709
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple fluorometric method for rapid screening of aflatoxins after their extraction by magnetic MOF-808/graphene oxide composite and their discrimination by HPLC

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the last few years, there has been an exponential growth in research works regarding the development of molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs) for mycotoxins analysis [ 19 , 20 ]. The effectiveness of MIPs relies on the formation of nanostructured binding sites in organic polymers, which are obtained using different strategies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last few years, there has been an exponential growth in research works regarding the development of molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs) for mycotoxins analysis [ 19 , 20 ]. The effectiveness of MIPs relies on the formation of nanostructured binding sites in organic polymers, which are obtained using different strategies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this procedure has not only been studied for liquid or oily food samples, other agri-food matrices including maize, wheat, pistachio or fruit samples have been tested using different magnetic nanomaterials [ 11 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 ]. In addition, two types of nanomaterials synthesized using ionic liquids for B1, B2, G1 and G2 AFs determination in milk and pistachio samples [ 19 , 20 ] and an imprinted molecular polymer [ 21 ] in milk, rice and wheat flour samples have been used for the determination of the four major aflatoxins together with AFM1 and AFM2 with the DMSPE procedure. All these studies were carried out via a targeted approach, clearly pointing out the lack of other studies also doing non-targeted analysis in order to assess the presence of other aflatoxin-derived metabolites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MIPs prepared by traditional bulk polymerization method have shortages of irregular particle morphology, deeply embedded templates, and slow mass transfer speed, which seriously affect their specific recognition capability to the target molecules. Surface molecular imprinting technology supplies a way to overcome above shortages by growing a thin MIP layer onto a suitable supporting carrier with regular structures, e.g., silica spheres. , As the imprinted layers are thin, the templates can be easily removed, and the remaining imprinted cavities is close to the surface which is beneficial to improve the mass transfer efficiency. ,, On the basis of the surface molecular imprinting technology, various MIPs targeting AFB 1 were developed based on different materials: creation of an MIP layer on mesoporous silicas and carbon dots for selective extraction of AFB 1 in food samples which was further analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), giving a limit of detection (LOD) of 0.118 ng/mL; coating MIP onto the gold chip to make surface plasmon resonance (SPR) sensor with a low LOD of 1.04 pg/mL; grafting MIP recognition sites onto quantum dots , and metal–organic frameworks , to prepare optical sensors with LODs in the level of ng/mL. In general, a dummy template imprinting strategy was mostly employed, e.g., using 5,7-dimethoxycoumarin (DMC) as the template instead of AFB 1 itself, due to pure AFB 1 being expensive and toxic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%