A self-administered 97-item simple food frequency questionnaire (FFQ), without portion size questions for most items, was completed twice at an one-year interval by 88 men and women in central Japan to evaluate its reproducibility. This FFQ was further validated by referring to four 4-day weighed dietary records (DRs) which were performed at 3-month intervals. Mean energy and 18 nutrient intakes measured by the first and the second FFQs were quite similar to those measured by the DRs. In our reproducibility study, Pearson and intraclass correlation coefficients, adjusted for energy intake, sex and age, ranged from 0.48 to 0.82 (median =0.67). In the validation study, adjusted and de-attenuated correlation coefficients between the second FFQ and the DRs ranged from 0.42 for iron to 0.83 for calcium (median=0.61). The proportion of subjects classified by the FFQ into the same or adjacent quintiles defined by the DRs was between 65.9% and 83.0% (median=69.9%). These findings essentially suggested that our FFQ is well reproducible and sufficiently valid, and therefore, reasonably useful for nutritional epidemiological studies for Japanese diets, particularly for those of Tokai Area. J Epidemiol, 1999; 9 : 227-234.reproducibility, validity, nutrient, food frequency questionnaire, Japan Food frequency questionnaires (FFQs) have been commonly used in nutritional epidemiology to assess individual intakes of food and nutrients. They can easily cover a larger period than dietary records (DRs) or recalls at much lower cost even in large populations1).However, since FFQs would be less valid than detailed DRs, then energy and nutrient intakes, when estimated by a certain FFQ, should usually be validated". Only a few validation study for FFQs, however, have been conducted in Japan7-9). Recently, we have developed a self-administered, 97-item simple food frequency questionnaire (FFQ), without portion size questions for most items, for epidemiological survey in the middle-aged and the older10). In the present study, we aimed to assess reproducibility and validity of this FFQ in terms of nutrients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study Design and SubjectsThe design of this validation study has been described in the preceding paper10>. In short, 119 subjects aged 41 to 88 years, were recruited from the family members of students/graduates of the dietitian course. They completed our self-administered FFQ twice at an one-year interval in order to evaluate the reproducibility (the first and the second FFQ are denoted hereafter as FFQ1 and FFQ2). Along with this reproducibility study, the FFQ was validated by referring to four 4-day weighed dietary records (DRs) which were performed at 3-month intervals. Of the 119 subjects, 88 (73.9%, 46 men and 42 women) completed the two FFQs and the four 4-day DRs, and were included in the analysis.The FFQ was designed to assess diets during preceding one year, and to rank individuals according to their nutrient intakes.