“…All of these equipments are effective and trustworthy if they are accordingly used with a proper loading set-up and system. However, there are typical drawbacks faced with the use of these conventional measurement devices, such as; (i) they provide only one measurement at a time, either strain or displacement [5], (ii) problems due to proper bonding of the strain gauges, (iii) de-bonding during the loading of the specimen, (iv) alignment of the strain gauge with the fibers when using strain gauges on composite materials [5], (v) tedious and time-consuming sample surface preparation and the strain gauge adhesion [6], (vi) complexity and impracticity of using too many strain gauges when the region of interests is a large one [7,8], (vii) the points measured by these conventional measurement devices cannot be dense and well distributed [9], deformations can only be measured at points where devices are mounted and in many cases would not cover the entire surface [10,11], (viii) possible damages to the measuring devices during the experiment, (ix) problems related to removal of the devices prior to specimen failure to avoid damage to the instrument, (x) high cost of measuring devices, and extra charges for data acquisition [12]. As a result, these drawbacks of conventional measurements have led researchers to develop non-contact full field deformation measurement techniques.…”