Geomorphologists often provide near-surface air temperature data for their study sites in publications. This is usually in the form of mean annual or monthly temperature. Inspection of papers in Earth Surface Processes and Landforms for 2004, 2005 and 2006 has shown that the source of these data is usually not given. Problems arise because scientists derive 'mean temperature' in different ways, which do not give the same result. It is suggested that a protocol is followed when presenting near-surface air temperature data for journal publication as part of site descriptions or results.Temperature is an important determinant of geomorphological process rates. Small increases in temperature, for example, can increase the rate of biological activity and many types of physico-chemical weathering (Whitaker, 1975;Selby, 1993;Yatsu, 1988). It is important for geomorphologists to be able to explore changes in processes related to small changes in temperature. For example, Holden and Adamson (2002) showed that the mean annual temperature at Moor House (NY 757328), an upland peatland in the northern English Pennines, was 5.2°C between 1931 and 1979 (based on Stevenson screen maximum-minimum mercury thermometer records held by UK's Environmental Change Network (ECN)) but was 5·8°C between 1991 and 2000 (based on daily maximum and minimum temperatures from an automatically logging Stevenson screen thermistor recording hourly averages of interrogations at 5 s intervals). This annual increase was associated with a significant increase in nightly minimum temperatures. As a consequence of this, the mean number of days with freezing near-surface air temperatures decreased from 133 to 101 per year and the number of potential freeze-thaw days (when near-surface air temperatures were both above and below freezing) decreased from 31 to 20 per year (Holden and Adamson, 2001). As frost heave is one of the main generators of sediment in many upland peatlands (e.g., Tallis, 1973), a small change in mean annual temperature, or the diurnal temperature range, at Moor House could have a large impact on potential sediment availability.Sometimes, geomorphological or temperature change can be explored by the same investigators through long-term recording at a site. In other cases, different investigators may visit a site previously studied by others, while some researchers may chose to utilize previously published data in the production of their own interpretation of process rates or to check geomorphological modelling predictions. A lack of information about the origins of temperature data and its analysis at particular sites can, however, present problems. Data from Moor House described above, for example, would suggest that there could have been a recent reduction in sediment availability through frost heave. This would lead to revised predictions of fine organic sediment production rates at the site. However, it is entirely possible that there has been no significant change in freeze-thaw frequency at the site and that the differences are at...