“…Similar comparative studies on mechanically ventilated adults (either under neuromuscular blockade or heavily sedated) also confirm that there is no significant difference between the two gas equilibration methods under these conditions [58,70]. MITCHELL et al [70], in 18 postcardiac surgery patients, found a correlation coefficient of 0.93, with a maximum difference of 430 mL between repeated trials.…”
Section: Direct Comparison Studies With Other Frc Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…They also found a correlation coefficient of 0.97 in comparison studies in 21 ventilated patients with normal lungs, and a mean±SD difference between paired measurements of 21±213 mL. IBAÑEZ et al [58], in dual studies performed on 12 mechanically ventilated patients with and without PEEP, found a correlation coefficient of 0.97 and no statistically significant difference between the two methods.…”
Section: Direct Comparison Studies With Other Frc Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Support for this view is provided by data from IBAÑEZ et al [58] both on spontaneously breathing subjects and mechanically ventilated patients, using the N 2 washout method. Conversely, other workers have not confirmed these findings in adult studies [59,60], but have found results similar to GEUBELLE et al [42].…”
Section: Equipment and Technical Proceduresmentioning
“…Similar comparative studies on mechanically ventilated adults (either under neuromuscular blockade or heavily sedated) also confirm that there is no significant difference between the two gas equilibration methods under these conditions [58,70]. MITCHELL et al [70], in 18 postcardiac surgery patients, found a correlation coefficient of 0.93, with a maximum difference of 430 mL between repeated trials.…”
Section: Direct Comparison Studies With Other Frc Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…They also found a correlation coefficient of 0.97 in comparison studies in 21 ventilated patients with normal lungs, and a mean±SD difference between paired measurements of 21±213 mL. IBAÑEZ et al [58], in dual studies performed on 12 mechanically ventilated patients with and without PEEP, found a correlation coefficient of 0.97 and no statistically significant difference between the two methods.…”
Section: Direct Comparison Studies With Other Frc Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Support for this view is provided by data from IBAÑEZ et al [58] both on spontaneously breathing subjects and mechanically ventilated patients, using the N 2 washout method. Conversely, other workers have not confirmed these findings in adult studies [59,60], but have found results similar to GEUBELLE et al [42].…”
Section: Equipment and Technical Proceduresmentioning
“…Thus, an approach based on stress and strain may have some advantages. The variability of FRC (and EELV) among patients with ALI [27,28] results in different degrees of strain even if the tidal volume is the same. Similarly, the variability of chest wall elastance leads to different transpulmonary pressures for the same plateau pressure applied [29].…”
“…Measurements of EELV at the ICU have always been limited by the use of expensive and bulky equipment and the use of tracer gases [8,9]. Stenqvist's group [10] have introduced a novel method to measure EELV without interrupting mechanical ventilation, based on a simplified and modified nitrogen multiple breath washout technique (NMBW), which is integrated in the Engström ventilator (GE Healthcare, Madison, Wisconsin, USA).…”
In conclusion, both FRC and EIT are promising clinical monitoring systems but clinical studies are needed to prove whether these monitors help the clinician toward effective and better ventilator management.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.