2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2017.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple method for monitoring of removal of arsenic species from drinking water applying on-site separation with solid phase extraction and detection by atomic absorption and X-ray fluorescence based techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The digestion process was continued for 45 min then the solution was prepared with 50 ml of distilled water (Kundu et al, 2018). The concentrations of arsenic were then measured by a flame atomic absorption spectroscopy at 197 nm (Farzana Akter et al, 2005;Mihucz et al, 2017).…”
Section: Digestion and Arsenic Determination Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The digestion process was continued for 45 min then the solution was prepared with 50 ml of distilled water (Kundu et al, 2018). The concentrations of arsenic were then measured by a flame atomic absorption spectroscopy at 197 nm (Farzana Akter et al, 2005;Mihucz et al, 2017).…”
Section: Digestion and Arsenic Determination Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extraction, adsorption, or preconcentration of the analyte of interest is another way to improve detectability. Several methods have been developed including the use of graphene oxide nanosheets for analysis of divalent metal ions and arsenic species, liquid-liquid microextraction for chromium speciation and selenium detection as well as preconcentration by means of co-deposition and microextraction to form complexes of rare earth elements [27][28][29][30][31][32][33]. Quantitative analysis of volatile elements like mercury has been achieved by complexation and oxidation [34].…”
Section: Environmental and Geological Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, a suitable preconcentration step prior to instrument detection is necessary. For the extraction of arsenic in different samples, a variety of methods have been used so far, including liquid-liquid extraction (LLE), 21 solid phase extraction (SPE), 22,23 cloud point extraction (CPE), 24 solid-phase microextraction, 25,26 dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) [27][28][29] and dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction based on solidication of a oating organic drop (DLLME-SFO). [30][31][32] Advantages and disadvantages of these techniques have already been discussed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%