2018
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6498/aaeeae
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple method to monitor the dose rate of secondary cosmic radiation at altitude

Abstract: Monitoring the ambient dose equivalent rate at aviation altitudes is an ambitious task, which requires sophisticated dosemeter systems and the possibility to carry out such measurements on board aircraft. A rather simple approach has been investigated in this study: soundings with weather balloons up to an altitude of 30 km. This paper summarises the measurements carried out between 2011 and 2016. The results indicate that annual measurements of the ambient dose equivalent rate at altitudes of around 20 km are… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the effective dose is not a measurable quantity, an ambient dose equivalent H* (10) is introduced [35]. For calculation of an ambient dose equivalent rate from a dose rate in silicon provided by AIRDOS, we used an approach described in [36]. This method was established for Liulin, nevertheless, AIRDOS utilises the exact same PIN diode as Liulin thus dose in silicon has to be the same.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Since the effective dose is not a measurable quantity, an ambient dose equivalent H* (10) is introduced [35]. For calculation of an ambient dose equivalent rate from a dose rate in silicon provided by AIRDOS, we used an approach described in [36]. This method was established for Liulin, nevertheless, AIRDOS utilises the exact same PIN diode as Liulin thus dose in silicon has to be the same.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparison of doses calculated by CARI 7 program and doses measured with three manufactured dosimeters and TEPC. Please note that error of the used computation method [36] of the ambient dose equivalent is ±2.6% and CARI 7 model deviation from ICRU reference data is from −4% to +14% [3]. The overall uncertainty of values provided by HAWK is 10% [40].…”
Section: Jinst 16 T03006mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation