2018
DOI: 10.3390/galaxies6030070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Simple Model for Explaining Galaxy Rotation Curves

Abstract: A new simple expression for the circular velocity of spiral galaxies is proposed and tested against HI Nearby Galaxy Survey (THINGS) data set. Its accuracy is compared with the one coming from MOND.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is unlikely, a priori, that all fits are possible for other galaxies, but that for these statistical reasons, this is possible for the vast majority of them. Note that recent results [14] using the Formula (34) in a purely phenomenological way and without any theoretical justifications allowed the good fits of 18 additional galaxies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is unlikely, a priori, that all fits are possible for other galaxies, but that for these statistical reasons, this is possible for the vast majority of them. Note that recent results [14] using the Formula (34) in a purely phenomenological way and without any theoretical justifications allowed the good fits of 18 additional galaxies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In this, we tried to follow as much as possible the historical approach of the American and Dutch mathematics schools which historically mathematically conceptualized projective differential geometry and its application to relativity. To quote Wojnar et al [14], we obtain a much simpler and in our opinion more mathematically justified modification of Newton's law.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The anomalous rotation curves of the galaxies have been invoked as a convincing proof of the existence of a new kind of matter that not couples to electromagnetic radiation and, consequently, is called dark matter. Anyway, many authors propose that a modified theory of gravity may account for these anomalies without invoking any kind of dark matter [51][52][53][54][55]. For all these reasons, it is not far-fetched to believe that General Relativity could be an incomplete theory, and not only in the sense that it remains inconsistent with quantum theory, but even from a purely classical point of view.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More confusingly, with the existing surveys, people had been more interested in declines in the curves associated with mass distribution cut-offs, so even when data already exhibit early signs of rising tails, they are instead interpreted as "asymptotically approaching a flat curve after a temporary dip" (see many examples of this morphology in the agnostic sample of THINGS curves in Wojnar et al [47]) and used to argue that earlier results showing declining curves do not provide the full picture, and making observations further out instead produces once again "flat" profiles. We do not quite agree with this "dip" interpretation (which assumes that the curves will flatten off rather than keep rising), because to produce this "rising back up" feature on top of the CDM or MOND profiles (which are smoothly declining or flat at large distances), baryonic matter must form a high density shell at extremely large galactocentric distances, and we have not seen any discussions as to why and how such a shell should form (especially since this morphology occurs quite frequently, the shell must be a ubiquitous robust feature of galaxies), or indeed seen any observational evidence for the existence of such shells at all.…”
Section: Anatomy Of Rotation Curvesmentioning
confidence: 99%