1994
DOI: 10.1016/0038-1101(94)90005-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple model for quantisation effects in heavily-doped silicon MOSFETs at inversion conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
101
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 260 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
101
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Second method is used in finding the threshold voltages accounting of DIBL effect, and first method finding ones accounting of VDQC model(is referenced to Van Dort Quantum Correction model) [5] and body effect. Figure 2 shows V th with and without DIBL effect when the drain voltage is 0.1V, 1.0V and 2.0V under the condition of the constant voltage scaling.…”
Section: Simulations and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second method is used in finding the threshold voltages accounting of DIBL effect, and first method finding ones accounting of VDQC model(is referenced to Van Dort Quantum Correction model) [5] and body effect. Figure 2 shows V th with and without DIBL effect when the drain voltage is 0.1V, 1.0V and 2.0V under the condition of the constant voltage scaling.…”
Section: Simulations and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high levels of substrate doping, needed in nanodevices to prevent the punch-through effect, and which enhance the quasi-two-dimensional (Q2D) nature of the carrier transport in the inversion layer, were found responsible for the increased threshold voltage and decreased channel mobility. A simple analytical model that accounts for this effect was proposed by van Dort and coworkers [62,63]. Vasileska and Ferry [64] confirmed these findings by investigating the doping dependence of the threshold voltage in MOS capacitors.…”
Section: Quantum Correctionsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The finite inversion layer thickness was estimated experimentally by Hartstein and Albert [38]. The high levels of substrate doping, needed in nano-devices to prevent the punch-through effect, that lead to quasi-two-dimensional (Q2D) nature of the carrier transport, were found responsible for the increased threshold voltage and decreased channel mobility, and a simple analytical model that accounts for this effect was proposed by van Dort and co-workers [39,40]. Later on, Vasileska and Ferry [ 41 ] confirmed these findings by investigating the doping dependence of the threshold voltage in MOS capacitors.…”
Section: The Role Of Quantum-mechanical Space Quantization Effects Onmentioning
confidence: 98%