1990
DOI: 10.1016/0734-743x(90)90035-t
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple one-dimensional approach to modelling ceramic composite armour defeat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
62
0
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
62
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A conservative estimate based on this change in aspect ratio suggests local engineering strains of at least 0. 6. Surprisingly, layers of intact chromium-sulfide appear to persist between the heavily deformed grains.…”
Section: Back Facementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A conservative estimate based on this change in aspect ratio suggests local engineering strains of at least 0. 6. Surprisingly, layers of intact chromium-sulfide appear to persist between the heavily deformed grains.…”
Section: Back Facementioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the shock wave/compression waves from the projectile impact reach the back surface of an unconfined sample, they generate release waves that travel back towards the front surface of the sample. These intersect with release waves emanating from the front surface and edges, causing the ceramic to be put in tension and begin to laterally and radially crack ahead of the projectile, causing the formation of a characteristic fracture conoid [2,[5][6][7]. This precursor damage and comminution reduces the stress exerted on the projectile and thus substantially limits the ballistic resistance of the ceramic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are different estimate for this angle. [6,27,28] For example, Woodward [6] considered this angle about 68 (the angle formed in quasi-static state). This is according to different approaches and considering the fact that in high-impact velocities, because of high energy of projectile, the projectile-ceramic interface force is more than the ceramic erosion stress.…”
Section: Ceramic Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…when b is very large), the R t is only a function of c and it can be evaluated as described in [15]: (6) Then, the penetration resistance of the ceramic at the initial impact is defined, and variation of this parameter during penetration process can be determined as follows [21] ( 7) where is the penetration velocity at the end of the first phase, and is the penetration resistance of the ceramic at the initial impact.…”
Section: Erosion Of Projectilementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation