2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2011.11.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple panel stationarity test in the presence of serial correlation and a common factor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
107
0
42

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 213 publications
(149 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
107
0
42
Order By: Relevance
“…In three different models in which each indicator represents financial deepening, the common dependent variable was GDP percapita, and common control variables were consumer price index, openness rate and government final expenditure to GDP. As there is cross-section dependence among the countries in the sample, econometric analysis was conducted with Hadri-Kurozumi (2012) (2008) co-integration test, which helps detect the long-term relationship among series that are statinary at different levels, was conducted. The Durbin-Hausman group test results of this method indicated that there is a long-term relationship between financial deepening and economic growth in some countries in the panel.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In three different models in which each indicator represents financial deepening, the common dependent variable was GDP percapita, and common control variables were consumer price index, openness rate and government final expenditure to GDP. As there is cross-section dependence among the countries in the sample, econometric analysis was conducted with Hadri-Kurozumi (2012) (2008) co-integration test, which helps detect the long-term relationship among series that are statinary at different levels, was conducted. The Durbin-Hausman group test results of this method indicated that there is a long-term relationship between financial deepening and economic growth in some countries in the panel.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on these findings, it can be concluded that there is cross-sectional dependence in the panel that underlies our study and country coefficients are homogeneous. The analyses continued with Hadri and Kurozumi (2012) unit root test, which takes cross-sectional dependence into account for stationary analysis.…”
Section: Ijefccsenetorgmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When being assumed in first generation panel unit root tests that all the units affected at the same rate from a shock happened just in one section; accepted in second generation panel unit root tests that each unit effects at different ratios from the same shock. Within this scope, the first generation panel unit root tests (Hadri 2000, Levin et al, 2002, Im et al, 2003, Breitung 2005 do not provide consistent results in case of being the cross section dependence; and the second generation panel unit root tests allow for (Taylor and Sarno 1998, Breuer et al, 2002, Pesaran 2007, Hadri and Kurozumi, 2012, the cross section dependence should be used. Consequently, in panel data studies, the cross section dependence in cointegration equation of the model or series in the model should be analyzed before estimating the models, then the unit root and the following tests used in analyses should be specified.…”
Section: Research In Applied Economicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the effect of macroeconomic uncertainty proxied by growth volatility, inflation volatility, exchange rate volatility, and interest volatility was analyzed by panel data analysis. The cross-sectional dependence among the series and homogeneity of the slope coefficients were analyzed by Breusch and Pagan (1980) Hadri and Kurozumi (2012) considering the existence of cross-sectional dependence and homogeneity. Random Effects Model (REM) was selected in the light of pretests of Breusch-Pagan (1980), Chow (1960) and Hausman (1978) tests.…”
Section: Econometric Model and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%