2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.proci.2020.06.215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple post-processing method to correct species predictions in artificially thickened turbulent flames

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other LES of the Cambridge burner, made with unstructured FV meshes refined only in the flame region, were also considered (Mercier al. 2015, Gruhlke et al 2021 and had a number of DOF between 6 × 10 6 to 17 × 10 6 for a minimum ∆ x value of 0.25 mm. Therefore, the discretizations employed in this work are also in this range of DOF values.…”
Section: Results Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other LES of the Cambridge burner, made with unstructured FV meshes refined only in the flame region, were also considered (Mercier al. 2015, Gruhlke et al 2021 and had a number of DOF between 6 × 10 6 to 17 × 10 6 for a minimum ∆ x value of 0.25 mm. Therefore, the discretizations employed in this work are also in this range of DOF values.…”
Section: Results Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This might affect the strength of the recirculation -although a significant change has not been observed as a result of grid refinement. For the swirled cases (not considered here), it is also known that a very long computational domain is required to obtain an accurate prediction of the recirculation zone [76]. The agreement gets better towards downstream locations, as the heat loss effects become insignificant.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This high difference is due to the use of equidistant orthogonal cartesian grids in the LES of Proch and Kempf whereas in this work the mesh is refined only in the flame region. Other LES of the Cambridge burner, made with unstructured FV meshes refined only in the flame region, were also considered [182,310] and had a number of DOF between 6 × 10 6 to 17 × 10 6 for a minimum ∆ x value of 0.25 mm. Therefore, the discretizations employed in this work are also in this range of DOF values.…”
Section: Results Analysis On Case Swb1mentioning
confidence: 99%